Godwin Okafor

20 papers receiving 371 citations

Peers

Godwin Okafor
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 77
  • Development 31
  • Economics and Econometrics 179
  • Strategy and Management 97
  • Information Systems 139
Replace Agnieszka Gehringer with:
Agnieszka Gehringer Germany
Roseline Nyakerario Misati Kenya
Shanaka Peiris United States
Gyan Pradhan United States
Valerija Botrić Croatia
Marc Schiffbauer United States
Maty Konté Netherlands
Evelyn Wamboye United States
Kazuo Inaba Japan
Siti Nurazira Mohd Daud Malaysia
Godwin Okafor relative to Agnieszka Gehringer Germany Agnieszka Gehringer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Agnieszka Gehringer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Godwin Okafor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Godwin Okafor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Godwin Okafor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Godwin Okafor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Godwin Okafor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Godwin Okafor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Godwin Okafor. The network helps show where Godwin Okafor may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Godwin Okafor, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Godwin Okafor Line = papers co-authored together Godwin Okafor links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202063
2 201554
3 201539
4 201738
5 201835
6 201432
7 201729
8 201827
9 201818
10 201710
11 20209
12 20217
13 20227
14 20216
15 20215
16 20155
17 20224
18 20223
19 20221
20
FDI in Transition Economies of Europe and the Former Soviet Union
20161

About Godwin Okafor

Godwin Okafor is a scholar working on Information Systems, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Accounting, having authored 22 papers that have together received 393 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic Growth and Development (10 papers), International Business and FDI (4 papers), Natural Resources and Economic Development (4 papers), Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence (4 papers), Religion, Society, and Development (3 papers), Global trade and economics (3 papers), Islamic Finance and Banking Studies (3 papers) and International Development and Aid (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (77 citations), Development (31 citations), Economics and Econometrics (179 citations), Strategy and Management (97 citations) and Information Systems (139 citations). Godwin Okafor has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, South Africa and Nigeria. Frequent co-authors include Jenifer Piesse, Allan Webster, Aruoriwo Marian Chijoke‐Mgbame, Sydney Chikalipah, Fakhrul Hasan, Samuel Owusu‐Agyei, Venancio Tauringana, Ishmael Tingbani, Alaa Mansour Zalata and Tansy Jessop. Their work appears in journals such as ˜The œJournal of developing areas, Thunderbird International Business Review, African Development Review, Defence and Peace Economics and Journal of International Development.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact