Defence and Peace Economics

1.1k papers and 14.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.1k papers published in Defence and Peace Economics in the last decades have received a total of 14.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Defence and Peace Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (831 papers), Sociology and Political Science (309 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (220 papers) specifically the topics of Defense, Military, and Policy Studies (688 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (353 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (241 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Defence and Peace Economics are J. Paul Dunne, Selami Sezgin, Christos Kollias, Ron Smith, Keith Hartley, Dursun Peksen, Todd Sandler, Eftychia Nikolaidou, Nicholas Sambanis and Jülide Yıldırım.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Defence and Peace Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Defence and Peace Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Defence and Peace Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Defence and Peace Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Defence and Peace Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Defence and Peace Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Defence and Peace Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025