Glenn Branch
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 10%
- Co-authors
- Eugenie C. ScottJoshua RosenauEric PlutzerAnn ReidMinda BerbecoLouise S. MeadJason R. WilesJon D. Miller
- Topics
- Evolution and Science Education (29 papers)Animal and Plant Science Education (15 papers)Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainCanada
In The Last Decade
Glenn Branch
33 papers receiving 234 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- History and Philosophy of Science 191
- Sociology and Political Science 132
- Social Psychology 121
- Education 67
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 45
Countries citing papers authored by Glenn Branch
This map shows the geographic impact of Glenn Branch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenn Branch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenn Branch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Glenn Branch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenn Branch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenn Branch. The network helps show where Glenn Branch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glenn Branch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glenn Branch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glenn Branch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glenn Branch. Glenn Branch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Reports of the National Center for Science Education 36:1 | 1 |
| 7 | Choose Controversies Wisely: When Teaching Scientific Argumentation, Selecting the Wrong Topic Can Impair-Rather Than Increase-Student Understanding | 5 |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Estrategemas del creacionismo | 1 |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | The Morphology of Steve | 2 |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Analysis of the Discovery Institute's "Bibliography of Supplementary Resources for Ohio Science Instruction.". | 1 |
| 20 | 9 |
About Glenn Branch
Glenn Branch is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Social Psychology and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, having authored 44 papers that have together received 287 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evolution and Science Education (29 papers), Animal and Plant Science Education (15 papers) and Religion, Ecology, and Ethics (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (191 citations), Social Psychology (121 citations) and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (45 citations). Glenn Branch has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Eugenie C. Scott, Joshua Rosenau, Eric Plutzer, Ann Reid, Minda Berbeco, Louise S. Mead, Jason R. Wiles, Jon D. Miller, Mark S. Ackerman and M. S. McCaffrey. Their work appears in journals such as Trends in Ecology & Evolution, BioScience and Scientific American.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.