Ann B. Shteir
- History and Philosophy of Science top 1%
- History top 2%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Co-authors
- Jan GolińskiBernard LightmanLudmilla JordanovaMaureen McNeilJacques CayouetteAlan G. GrossCharles TaylorWilliam Keith
- Topics
- History of Science and Natural History (11 papers)Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers)Plant and animal studies (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaHungaryUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Ann B. Shteir
17 papers receiving 179 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- History and Philosophy of Science 103
- History 60
- Anthropology 57
- Sociology and Political Science 39
- Literature and Literary Theory 38
Countries citing papers authored by Ann B. Shteir
This map shows the geographic impact of Ann B. Shteir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ann B. Shteir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ann B. Shteir more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ann B. Shteir
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ann B. Shteir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ann B. Shteir. The network helps show where Ann B. Shteir may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ann B. Shteir
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ann B. Shteir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ann B. Shteir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ann B. Shteir. Ann B. Shteir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | The Collected Letters of Charlotte Smith. Judith Phillips Stanton, ed. Bloomington. | 4 |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | Book reviews-cultivating women, cultivating science. Flora's daughters and botany in England 1760-1860 | 1 |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 25 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 72 | |
| 12 | 84 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | The Meridian Anthology of Early Women Writers: British Literary Women from Aphra Behn to Maria Edgeworth 1660-1800, K.M. Rogers and W. McCarthy, eds.; The Sign of Angellica: Women, Writing and Fiction, 1660-1800, Janet Todd | 1 |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Sexual Harassment: York University's Response | 1 |
| 20 | 2 |
About Ann B. Shteir
Ann B. Shteir is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Anthropology and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, having authored 22 papers that have together received 269 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Science and Natural History (11 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (6 papers) and Plant and animal studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (103 citations), Anthropology (57 citations) and History (60 citations). Ann B. Shteir has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Hungary and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jan Goliński, Bernard Lightman, Ludmilla Jordanova, Maureen McNeil, Jacques Cayouette, Alan G. Gross, Charles Taylor, William Keith, Jack Selzer and Steven Shapin. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The William and Mary Quarterly and College English.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.