Glendaliz Bosques
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Gender Studies top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Safety Research top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Nethra AnkamCarley SauterSteven A. StiensR. Samuel MayerFaren H. WilliamsJulie K. SilverCristina SadowskyRebecca Martin
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers)Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers)Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers)
- Journals
- Academic MedicineAmerican Journal of Physical Medicine & RehabilitationPediatric Clinics of North America
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Glendaliz Bosques
13 papers receiving 193 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 95
- Gender Studies 77
- General Health Professions 58
- Safety Research 36
- Sociology and Political Science 26
Countries citing papers authored by Glendaliz Bosques
This map shows the geographic impact of Glendaliz Bosques's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glendaliz Bosques with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glendaliz Bosques more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Glendaliz Bosques
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glendaliz Bosques. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glendaliz Bosques. The network helps show where Glendaliz Bosques may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glendaliz Bosques
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glendaliz Bosques. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glendaliz Bosques based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glendaliz Bosques. Glendaliz Bosques is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 70 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 17 | |
| 16 | 11 |
About Glendaliz Bosques
Glendaliz Bosques is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Rehabilitation and Psychiatry and Mental health, having authored 16 papers that have together received 195 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Diversity and Career in Medicine (6 papers) and Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (77 citations), Safety Research (36 citations) and Rehabilitation (23 citations). Glendaliz Bosques has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nethra Ankam, Carley Sauter, Steven A. Stiens, R. Samuel Mayer, Faren H. Williams, Julie K. Silver, Cristina Sadowsky, Rebecca Martin, Charles A. Odonkor and Jay M. Weiss. Their work appears in journals such as Academic Medicine, American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation and Pediatric Clinics of North America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.