Glen E. Kisby

47 papers receiving 1.8k citations

Peers

Glen E. Kisby
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
  • Aging 54
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 291
  • Neurology 279
  • Cancer Research 258
  • Clinical Biochemistry 94
Replace William M. Valentine with:
William M. Valentine United States
Gino Cortopassi United States
Georgia Dolios United States
Zhaofa Xu China
Herbert Wiegand Germany
Jason R. Cannon United States
Evelyn Tiffany‐Castiglioni United States
László Tretter Hungary
Atsushi Mitsumoto Japan
Jeferson Luís Franco Brazil
Glen E. Kisby relative to William M. Valentine United States William M. Valentine's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
William M. Valentine · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Glen E. Kisby

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Glen E. Kisby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glen E. Kisby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glen E. Kisby more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Glen E. Kisby

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glen E. Kisby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glen E. Kisby. The network helps show where Glen E. Kisby may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Glen E. Kisby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Glen E. Kisby Line = papers co-authored together Glen E. Kisby links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 47 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2013433
2 2007167
3
Heterozygosity for the mouse Apex gene results in phenotypes associated with oxidative stress.
2001152
4 199288
5 199778
6 200964
7 199161
8 201153
9 198853
10 201150
11 199950
12 202146
13 200941
14 199940
15 201234
16 200334
17 199331
18 201330
19 201129
20 201629

About Glen E. Kisby

Glen E. Kisby is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Plant Science, Neurology, Cancer Research and Environmental Chemistry, having authored 47 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (11 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (9 papers), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (8 papers), DNA Repair Mechanisms (7 papers), Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments (7 papers), Marine Toxins and Detection Methods (7 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (6 papers) and Mitochondrial Function and Pathology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (54 citations), Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (291 citations), Neurology (279 citations), Cancer Research (258 citations) and Clinical Biochemistry (94 citations). Glen E. Kisby has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Peter S. Spencer, John P. Rooney, Amanda S. Bess, Ataman Sendoel, Michael O. Hengartner, Maxwell C. K. Leung, Joel N. Meyer, Michael Lasarev, Albert C. Ludolph and Juan Muñiz. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Metabolism Reviews, International Journal of Molecular Sciences, Toxicological Sciences, NeuroToxicology and Neurology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact