J. Amber Scherer

15 total papers · 660 total citations
8 papers, 515 citations indexed

About

J. Amber Scherer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations and Plant Science. According to data from OpenAlex, J. Amber Scherer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 515 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Plant Science. Recurrent topics in J. Amber Scherer's work include Policing Practices and Perceptions (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers). J. Amber Scherer is often cited by papers focused on Policing Practices and Perceptions (3 papers), Crime Patterns and Interventions (3 papers) and Pesticide Exposure and Toxicity (3 papers). J. Amber Scherer collaborates with scholars based in United States. J. Amber Scherer's co-authors include Cynthia Lum, Megan Stoltz, Christopher S. Koper, Linda McCauley, Michael Lasarev, Glen E. Kisby, Yoke W. Kow, Kiron Koshy, Juan Muñiz and Valle Nazar‐Stewart and has published in prestigious journals such as Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, Criminology & Public Policy and Police Quarterly.

In The Last Decade

J. Amber Scherer

8 papers receiving 493 citations

Hit Papers

Research on body‐worn cam... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
J. Amber Scherer 237 222 175 82 77 8 515
John B. Bourke 75 0.3× 39 0.2× 127 0.7× 27 0.3× 9 0.1× 28 493
Carolyn Raffensperger 174 0.7× 23 0.1× 43 0.2× 69 0.8× 4 0.1× 12 448
Kelly Jones 49 0.2× 14 0.1× 107 0.6× 34 0.4× 5 0.1× 24 454
Wagner Lopes Soares 48 0.2× 9 0.0× 253 1.4× 47 0.6× 37 0.5× 20 530
Randall Smith 96 0.4× 50 0.2× 17 0.1× 38 0.5× 3 0.0× 25 463
Berwood Yost 127 0.5× 60 0.3× 36 0.2× 37 0.5× 41 0.5× 19 503
Susan Gabbard 184 0.8× 5 0.0× 172 1.0× 35 0.4× 41 0.5× 18 551
Tracey Farrigan 114 0.5× 11 0.0× 85 0.5× 36 0.4× 67 0.9× 19 545
Maartje van Lieshout 138 0.6× 65 0.3× 34 0.2× 14 0.2× 4 0.1× 7 458
Donna Dosman 234 1.0× 10 0.0× 72 0.4× 10 0.1× 61 0.8× 13 590

Countries citing papers authored by J. Amber Scherer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of J. Amber Scherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Amber Scherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Amber Scherer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by J. Amber Scherer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Amber Scherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Amber Scherer. The network helps show where J. Amber Scherer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Amber Scherer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Amber Scherer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Amber Scherer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Amber Scherer. J. Amber Scherer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026