Glen Creeber
Impact in
- Communication top 5%
- Media Studies and Communication
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Media, Gender, and Advertising
- Gender, Feminism, and Media
Papers in
-
- Media Studies and Communication 5
- Cultural Studies and Postmodernism 1
- Music 1
- Co-authors
- Matt HillsJohn TullochToby Miller
- Journals
- Media Culture & Society (2 papers)Television & New Media (2 papers)New Review of Film and Television Studies (2 papers)International Journal of Cultural Studies (1 paper)Journal of Screenwriting (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Glen Creeber
19 papers receiving 282 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Communication 120
- Gender Studies 81
- Literature and Literary Theory 70
- Cultural Studies 51
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 27
Countries citing papers authored by Glen Creeber
This map shows the geographic impact of Glen Creeber's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glen Creeber with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glen Creeber more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Glen Creeber
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glen Creeber. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glen Creeber. The network helps show where Glen Creeber may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Glen Creeber, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 58 | |
| 2 | Small Screen Aesthetics: From TV to the Internet | 2013 | 8 |
| 3 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 8 | |
| 5 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 6 | Online-Serien : Intime Begegnung der dritten Art | 2010 | 0 |
| 7 | 2009 | 11 | |
| 8 | The Television Genre Book (2nd ed.) | 2008 | 7 |
| 9 | Digital Cultures: Understanding New Media | 2008 | 79 |
| 10 | 2007 | 1 | |
| 11 | 2007 | 7 | |
| 12 | Tele-visions: An Introduction to Studying Television | 2006 | 13 |
| 13 | 2006 | 18 | |
| 14 | Serial Television: Big Drama on the Small Screen | 2005 | 48 |
| 15 | 2004 | 22 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 17 | 2001 | 5 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 27 | |
| 19 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 20 | 1996 | 0 |
About Glen Creeber
Glen Creeber is a scholar working on Communication, Music, Literature and Literary Theory, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Gender Studies, having authored 21 papers that have together received 364 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Studies and Communication (5 papers), Crime and Detective Fiction Studies (2 papers), Cultural Studies and Postmodernism (1 paper), Digital Games and Media (1 paper), German History and Society (1 paper), Gender, Feminism, and Media (1 paper), Philippine History and Culture (1 paper) and Narrative Theory and Analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (120 citations), Gender Studies (81 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (70 citations), Cultural Studies (51 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (27 citations). Glen Creeber has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Matt Hills, John Tulloch and Toby Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Media Culture & Society, Television & New Media, New Review of Film and Television Studies, International Journal of Cultural Studies and Journal of Screenwriting.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.