Gin-Shin Chen

899 citations
52 papers · 597 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Gin-Shin Chen

52 papers receiving 586 citations

Peers

Gin-Shin Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 107
  • Dermatology 111
  • Bioengineering 35
  • Biomedical Engineering 262
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 24
  • Cell Biology 63
Replace Kelvin Donne with:
Kelvin Donne United Kingdom
Tim Bashford United Kingdom
Paulo R. Bargo United States
Yusuke Sakurai Japan
Anant Agrawal United States
Won-Ho Kang South Korea
Emilia Kaivosoja Finland
Yuandong Li United States
Sourav S. Patnaik United States
Manijhe Mokhtari‐Dizaji Iran
Gin-Shin Chen relative to Kelvin Donne United Kingdom Kelvin Donne's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12×
Kelvin Donne · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gin-Shin Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gin-Shin Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gin-Shin Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gin-Shin Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gin-Shin Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gin-Shin Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gin-Shin Chen. The network helps show where Gin-Shin Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gin-Shin Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gin-Shin Chen Line = papers co-authored together Gin-Shin Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199862
2 202054
3 200647
4 200145
5 200541
6 200836
7 201532
8 201426
9 200423
10 201321
11 201215
12 201415
13 200315
14 202014
15 201813
16 202010
17 20069
18 20008
19 20008
20 20237

About Gin-Shin Chen

Gin-Shin Chen is a scholar working on Biomedical Engineering, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Surgery and Mechanics of Materials, having authored 52 papers that have together received 597 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (19 papers), Ultrasound Imaging and Elastography (12 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (9 papers), Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation (5 papers), Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials (5 papers), Pain Mechanisms and Treatments (4 papers), Anesthesia and Pain Management (4 papers) and Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Dermatology (111 citations), Bioengineering (35 citations), Biomedical Engineering (262 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (24 citations) and Cell Biology (63 citations). Gin-Shin Chen has collaborated with scholars based in Taiwan, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Chou‐Ching K. Lin, Ming‐Shaung Ju, Jyh‐Jier Ho, Chien‐Sheng Wu, Yuanxing Fang, Chee‐Yin Chai, Jing‐Jenn Lin, Feng‐Huei Lin, Stephen Chu‐Sung Hu and Chi‐Hang Lee. Their work appears in journals such as British Journal of Dermatology, Ultrasound in Medicine & Biology, Microscopy and Microanalysis, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering and IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact