Microscopy and Microanalysis

13.8k papers and 68.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.8k papers published in Microscopy and Microanalysis in the last decades have received a total of 68.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Microscopy and Microanalysis usually cover Surfaces, Coatings and Films (4.8k papers), Biomedical Engineering (3.9k papers) and Materials Chemistry (3.6k papers) specifically the topics of Electron and X-Ray Spectroscopy Techniques (4.7k papers), Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3.1k papers) and Atom Probe Tomography Research (2.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Microscopy and Microanalysis are Colin Ophus, Stuart I. Wright, Matthew M. Nowell, David P. Field, David N. Mastronarde, Douglas L. Dorset, Nicholas W. M. Ritchie, Thomas F. Kelly, Joseph R. Michael and János L. Lábár.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Microscopy and Microanalysis

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Microscopy and Microanalysis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Microscopy and Microanalysis.

Countries where authors publish in Microscopy and Microanalysis

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Microscopy and Microanalysis. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Microscopy and Microanalysis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Microscopy and Microanalysis more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025