Gina Jay

1.8k citations
27 papers · 1.5k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 14

Gina Jay

27 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Hit Papers

What Do Global Self-Rated Health Items Measure?5741994202620042015100200300400500

Peers

Gina Jay
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 199
  • Health 560
  • General Health Professions 548
  • Demography 217
  • Applied Psychology 69
Replace Sanna Read with:
Sanna Read United Kingdom
Joan Bennett United States
Linda A. Wray United States
Peter G. Coleman United Kingdom
Graeme Ford United Kingdom
Heehyul Moon United States
Carolien Smits Netherlands
Émilie Raymond Canada
Zvi D. Gellis United States
Frederic Malter Germany
Gina Jay relative to Sanna Read United Kingdom Sanna Read's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Sanna Read · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gina Jay

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gina Jay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gina Jay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gina Jay more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gina Jay

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gina Jay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gina Jay. The network helps show where Gina Jay may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gina Jay, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gina Jay Line = papers co-authored together Gina Jay links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20242
2 20242
3 20239
4 20232
5 20232
6 20222
7 20224
8 20228
9 202111
10 202115
11 202148
12 20203
13 20158
14
What Do Global Self-Rated Health Items Measure?breakdown →
1994574
15 199361
16
Patterns of nonresponse in a national survey of elderly Japanese.
199334
17 1992181
18 1992102
19 199184
20 199157

About Gina Jay

Gina Jay is a scholar working on Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health, Demography, Social Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (5 papers), Cancer survivorship and care (4 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Aging and Gerontology Research (3 papers), Management of metastatic bone disease (3 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (3 papers) and Health and Well-being Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (199 citations), Health (560 citations), General Health Professions (548 citations), Demography (217 citations) and Applied Psychology (69 citations). Gina Jay has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Vietnam. Frequent co-authors include Neal Krause, Sherry L. Willis, Jersey Liang, Jersey Liang, Michael Marsiske, Manfred Diehl, Roger C. Loeb, Anthony R. D’Augelli, Sean R. Smith and Linda M. Goldenhar. Their work appears in journals such as Research on Aging, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Psychology and Aging, Developmental Psychology and Cancer.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026