Gilbert H. Schubert
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Ecology top 10%
- Plant Science
- Atmospheric Science
- Topics
- Forest ecology and management (13 papers)Seedling growth and survival studies (12 papers)Seed Germination and Physiology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomMalawi
In The Last Decade
Gilbert H. Schubert
28 papers receiving 326 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 43
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 273
- Global and Planetary Change 255
- Ecology 191
- Plant Science 80
- Atmospheric Science 56
Countries citing papers authored by Gilbert H. Schubert
This map shows the geographic impact of Gilbert H. Schubert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gilbert H. Schubert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gilbert H. Schubert more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gilbert H. Schubert
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gilbert H. Schubert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gilbert H. Schubert. The network helps show where Gilbert H. Schubert may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gilbert H. Schubert
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gilbert H. Schubert. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gilbert H. Schubert based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gilbert H. Schubert. Gilbert H. Schubert is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Silvical Characteristics of Incense-Cedar | 1 |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 169 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | Seed origin and size of ponderosa pine planting stock grown at several California nurseries | 1 |
| 10 | Fungi associated with viability losses of Sugar Pine seed during cold storage. | 2 |
| 11 | Root regeneration by seedlings: Ability of ponderosa pine seedling to regenerate root system rapidly after transplanting is important factor in survival | 1 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | Freezing injury to young sugar pine | 2 |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 6 | |
| 16 | Ponderosa pine cone cutting by squirrels | 2 |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 4 | |
| 19 | 9 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Gilbert H. Schubert
Gilbert H. Schubert is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Forestry and Plant Science, having authored 33 papers that have together received 466 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Forest ecology and management (13 papers), Seedling growth and survival studies (12 papers) and Seed Germination and Physiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (273 citations), Global and Planetary Change (255 citations) and Ecology (191 citations). Gilbert H. Schubert has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Malawi. Frequent co-authors include Henry A. Pearson, A. G. Wollum, H. A. Fowells, E. C. Stone, Claude Gertz and Pascal Chavigny. Their work appears in journals such as Soil Science Society of America Journal, Forest Science and Journal of Forestry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.