E. W. Tisdale
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- J.W. BurkhardtA. McLeanM. HironakaC. E. PoultonM. A. FosbergJohn T. CurtisHoward L. MortonLilian Marchand
- Topics
- Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (16 papers)Rangeland and Wildlife Management (10 papers)Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
E. W. Tisdale
29 papers receiving 558 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
- Ecology 508
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 410
- Global and Planetary Change 288
- Plant Science 228
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 97
Countries citing papers authored by E. W. Tisdale
This map shows the geographic impact of E. W. Tisdale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by E. W. Tisdale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites E. W. Tisdale more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by E. W. Tisdale
This network shows the impact of papers produced by E. W. Tisdale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by E. W. Tisdale. The network helps show where E. W. Tisdale may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of E. W. Tisdale
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of E. W. Tisdale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of E. W. Tisdale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with E. W. Tisdale. E. W. Tisdale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Soil-Plant Relationships and Vertical Zonation in the Southern Interior of British Columbia1 | 0 |
| 2 | Native Vegetation of Idaho | 4 |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | 57 | |
| 8 | 48 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | The ecotype concept in range management. | 1 |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | Intraspecific variation in Festuca. | 2 |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 23 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 28 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 17 |
About E. W. Tisdale
E. W. Tisdale is a scholar working on Nature and Landscape Conservation, Anthropology and Forestry, having authored 32 papers that have together received 740 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Botany, Ecology, and Taxonomy Studies (16 papers), Rangeland and Wildlife Management (10 papers) and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (410 citations), Ecology (508 citations) and Global and Planetary Change (288 citations). E. W. Tisdale has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include J.W. Burkhardt, A. McLean, M. Hironaka, C. E. Poulton, M. A. Fosberg, John T. Curtis, Howard L. Morton, Lilian Marchand, Lincoln Ellison and Lana J. Williams. Their work appears in journals such as Ecology, Ecological Monographs and Journal of Wildlife Management.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.