Gil Zukerman

547 citations
34 papers · 337 · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

Gil Zukerman

31 papers receiving 331 citations

Peers

Gil Zukerman
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 145
  • Clinical Psychology 125
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 74
  • Health 28
  • Speech and Hearing 17
Replace Charlotte C. van Schie with:
Charlotte C. van Schie Netherlands
Louise Roper United Kingdom
Virgínia de Oliveira Rosa Brazil
Anne M. Fontana United States
Steven William Kasparek United States
Bruno Faustino Portugal
Henry Sachs United States
Daniel Klee United States
Courtney L. Weiner United States
Trevor Powell United Kingdom
Gil Zukerman relative to Charlotte C. van Schie Netherlands Charlotte C. van Schie's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Charlotte C. van Schie · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gil Zukerman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gil Zukerman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gil Zukerman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gil Zukerman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gil Zukerman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gil Zukerman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gil Zukerman. The network helps show where Gil Zukerman may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gil Zukerman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gil Zukerman Line = papers co-authored together Gil Zukerman links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 34 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200550
2 201325
3 201323
4 202122
5 201921
6 201920
7 201117
8 201614
9
The effect of 24-40 hours of sleep deprivation on the P300 response to auditory target stimuli.
200713
10 201812
11 202012
12 201811
13 201910
14 202310
15 202110
16 20198
17 20168
18 20167
19 20037
20 20176

About Gil Zukerman

Gil Zukerman is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology and Health, having authored 34 papers that have together received 337 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (8 papers), Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (5 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (4 papers), Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology (4 papers), Migration, Health and Trauma (4 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (4 papers), Stuttering Research and Treatment (4 papers) and Multisensory perception and integration (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (145 citations), Clinical Psychology (125 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (74 citations), Health (28 citations) and Speech and Hearing (17 citations). Gil Zukerman has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, Canada and Türkiye. Frequent co-authors include Leah Fostick, Liat Korn, Harvey Babkoff, Esther Ben‐Itzchak, Michal Icht, Elisheva Ben‐Artzi, Boaz M. Ben‐David, Ditza A. Zachor, Abraham Goldstein and Michal Pinhas. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology Health & Medicine, Psychiatry Research, Journal of Religion and Health, International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact