Gideon Calder

451 citations
45 papers · 184 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Gideon Calder

38 papers receiving 167 citations

Peers

Gideon Calder
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
  • Political Science and International Relations 56
  • Sociology and Political Science 92
  • Philosophy 22
  • General Health Professions 41
  • Public Administration 5
Replace Felisa Tibbitts with:
Felisa Tibbitts United States
Samantha Brennan Canada
Paula Hamilton United Kingdom
Timo Jütten United Kingdom
Jane Roberts United Kingdom
Beth Moore Milroy Canada
Sally J. Scholz United States
Paul Bou‐Habib United Kingdom
David Marshall United States
David Ray Papke United States
Gideon Calder relative to Felisa Tibbitts United States Felisa Tibbitts's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.2×
Felisa Tibbitts · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gideon Calder

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gideon Calder's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gideon Calder with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gideon Calder more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gideon Calder

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gideon Calder. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gideon Calder. The network helps show where Gideon Calder may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gideon Calder, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gideon Calder Line = papers co-authored together Gideon Calder links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 45 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201836
2 201020
3 201510
4 20089
5 20129
6
Rorty's Politics of Redescription
20079
7 20108
8 20147
9 20097
10 20217
11 20076
12 20095
13 20114
14 20224
15
Rorty and redescription
20033
16 20203
17 20163
18 20163
19 20182
20 20052

About Gideon Calder

Gideon Calder is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, General Health Professions, Philosophy and Education, having authored 45 papers that have together received 184 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (5 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), Foucault, Power, and Ethics (4 papers), Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Healthcare innovation and challenges (3 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (56 citations), Sociology and Political Science (92 citations), Philosophy (22 citations), General Health Professions (41 citations) and Public Administration (5 citations). Gideon Calder has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Anca Gheaus, Jürgen De Wispelaere, Andrew Collier, Phillip Cole, Jonathan Seglow, Emanuela Ceva, Simon Read, Ceri Phillips, Michael Rembis and Mark Donovan. Their work appears in journals such as Ethics and Social Welfare, Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Political Studies Review, Journal of Critical Realism and Res Publica.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact