Emanuela Ceva

45 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Emanuela Ceva
Comparison fields: 5 of 55
  • Law 61
  • Political Science and International Relations 145
  • Information Systems and Management 35
  • Philosophy 54
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 60
Replace Frederick Rosen with:
Frederick Rosen United Kingdom
Lawrence Hamilton South Africa
R. E. Ewin Australia
Gerald J. Postema United States
Andrew Oldenquist United States
Peter J. Steinberger United States
David L. Gregory United States
Toni Erskine Australia
Carnes Lord United States
Susanne Krasmann Germany
Emanuela Ceva relative to Frederick Rosen United Kingdom Frederick Rosen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.3×
Frederick Rosen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Emanuela Ceva

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Emanuela Ceva's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Emanuela Ceva with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Emanuela Ceva more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Emanuela Ceva

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Emanuela Ceva. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Emanuela Ceva. The network helps show where Emanuela Ceva may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside Emanuela Ceva, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Emanuela Ceva Line = papers co-authored together Emanuela Ceva links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201926
2 202125
3 202124
4
Is whistleblowing a duty?
201823
5 201721
6 201715
7 201615
8 200913
9 201213
10 201812
11 202112
12 201810
13 20079
14 20149
15 20219
16 20189
17 20138
18 20087
19
Interactive Justice: A Proceduralist Approach to Value Conflict in Politics
20167
20 20146

About Emanuela Ceva

Emanuela Ceva is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Cognitive Neuroscience, Law and Philosophy, having authored 52 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (30 papers), Corruption and Economic Development (8 papers), Free Will and Agency (8 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (6 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (5 papers), Judicial and Constitutional Studies (5 papers), Law in Society and Culture (4 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Law (61 citations), Political Science and International Relations (145 citations), Information Systems and Management (35 citations), Philosophy (54 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (60 citations). Emanuela Ceva has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Switzerland and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Maria Paola Ferretti, Valeria Ottonelli, Andrea Fracasso, Colleen Murphy, Carla Bagnoli, Dorota Mokrosińska, Matteo Bonotti and Nenad Stojanović. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, Philosophy Compass, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Journal of Applied Philosophy and Journal of Social Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact