Phillip Cole

1.4k citations
41 papers · 667 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Phillip Cole

37 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Phillip Cole
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
  • Political Science and International Relations 205
  • Sociology and Political Science 292
  • Infectious Diseases 66
  • Clinical Biochemistry 23
  • Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 6
Replace Nicole Reynolds with:
Nicole Reynolds United States
Jean E. Howard United States
Timothy F. Murphy United States
Simo Virtanen Finland
Jorge Alberto Bernstein Iriart Brazil
Patrice Pinell France
Jornt J. Mandemakers Netherlands
James C. Mohr United States
Mark Phillips Canada
P. H. Reddy United Kingdom
Phillip Cole relative to Nicole Reynolds United States Nicole Reynolds's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×12.1×
Nicole Reynolds · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Cole

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Cole's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Cole with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Cole more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Cole

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Cole. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Cole. The network helps show where Phillip Cole may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Phillip Cole, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Phillip Cole Line = papers co-authored together Phillip Cole links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 41 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2000164
2 201175
3 200768
4 200540
5 201432
6 200626
7 198823
8 201021
9 201520
10 198918
11 201418
12 200717
13 200714
14 201212
15 202111
16 200811
17 201111
18 197310
19 20159
20 20148

About Phillip Cole

Phillip Cole is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Infectious Diseases, General Health Professions and Epidemiology, having authored 41 papers that have together received 667 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (8 papers), Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus (7 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (6 papers), Pneumonia and Respiratory Infections (4 papers), Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria (3 papers), Antibiotics Pharmacokinetics and Efficacy (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection (2 papers) and Political Theology and Sovereignty (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (205 citations), Sociology and Political Science (292 citations), Infectious Diseases (66 citations), Clinical Biochemistry (23 citations) and Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology (6 citations). Phillip Cole has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Heath Wellman, Fan Chen, H. David Friedland, George Udeani, Alena Jandourek, A. Smith, David M. Rimmer, Keith S. Kaye, Jonathan Seglow and David J. Lefer. Their work appears in journals such as Res Publica, Journal of Applied Philosophy, Journal of Global Ethics, Journal of Chemotherapy and Arbor.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact