Jane Roberts

487 total citations
17 papers, 221 citations indexed

About

Jane Roberts is a scholar working on Classics, History and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Roberts has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 221 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Classics, 4 papers in History and 3 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Jane Roberts's work include Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers). Jane Roberts is often cited by papers focused on Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Linguistics and language evolution (3 papers) and Social Policy and Reform Studies (2 papers). Jane Roberts collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Jane Roberts's co-authors include Jennifer Neville, da Vinci Leonardo, Michelangelo Buonarroti, Kenneth D. Keele, Henry P. Raleigh and M. Alexander and has published in prestigious journals such as Leonardo, The Modern Language Review and Journal of Loss and Trauma.

In The Last Decade

Jane Roberts

16 papers receiving 173 citations

Peers

Jane Roberts

SPS

CLASS

LL

PSIR

HISTO

Betsy Wing

Carol J. Clover United States

Catholic Church United States

Peter France United Kingdom

Victor Brombert United States

Susan Groag Bell Czechia

Catherine Cox United Kingdom

Christopher Stray United Kingdom

David Daube United States

R. Howard Bloch United States

Betsy Wing

Jane Roberts

69 ×1.4

SPS

26 ×0.5

CLASS

22 ×0.6

LL

36 ×1.2

PSIR

41 ×1.4

HISTO

Citations per year, relative to Jane Roberts Jane Roberts (= 1×) peers Betsy Wing

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Roberts

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Roberts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Roberts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Roberts more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Roberts

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Roberts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Roberts. The network helps show where Jane Roberts may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Roberts

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Roberts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Roberts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Roberts. Jane Roberts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

17 of 17 papers shown

1.

Roberts, Jane. (2020). The leadership of place and people in the new English combined authorities. Local Government Studies. 46(6). 995–1014. 19 indexed citations

2.

Roberts, Jane. (2019). The Underappreciated Loss of Political Office. Journal of Loss and Trauma. 24(8). 706–720. 4 indexed citations

3.

Roberts, Jane. (2018). Exiting the political stage: exploring the impact on representative democracy. British Politics. 14(4). 391–407. 6 indexed citations

4.

Roberts, Jane, et al.. (2015). Developing effective therapeutic relationships with children, young people and their families. Nursing Children and Young People. 27(4). 30–35. 17 indexed citations

5.

Roberts, Jane, et al.. (2013). Reading La3amon’s <i>Brut</i>. 1 indexed citations

6.

Roberts, Jane & Jennifer Neville. (2002). Representations of the Natural World in Old English Poetry. The Yearbook of English Studies. 32. 260–260. 22 indexed citations

7.

Roberts, Jane. (2002). Rewriting Old English in the Twelfth Century. Notes and Queries. 49(2). 267–268. 8 indexed citations

8.

Roberts, Jane, et al.. (1999). Royal Landscape: The Gardens and Parks of Windsor. Garden History. 27(2). 257–257. 1 indexed citations

9.

Roberts, Jane. (1996). The Politics of Attachment: Towards A Secure Society. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 25 indexed citations

10.

Roberts, Jane. (1995). Cancer Wars: How Politics Shapes What We Know and Don't Know about Cancer. BMJ. 311(7010). 959.1–959.1. 69 indexed citations

11.

Roberts, Jane & Michelangelo Buonarroti. (1988). A dictionary of Michelangelo's watermarks. 1 indexed citations

12.

Roberts, Jane, et al.. (1987). The Old English Riming Poem. The Modern Language Review. 82(2). 434–434. 1 indexed citations

13.

Roberts, Jane, et al.. (1985). Linguistic Means of Determining the Dates of Old English Literary Texts. The Yearbook of English Studies. 15. 268–268. 30 indexed citations

14.

Leonardo, da Vinci, et al.. (1983). Leonardo da Vinci: Anatomical drawings from the Royal Library, Windsor Castle. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 4 indexed citations

15.

Raleigh, Henry P. & Jane Roberts. (1979). The World View of Paul Cezanne: A Psychic Interpretation. Leonardo. 12(2). 168–168.

16.

Roberts, Jane, et al.. (1972). Seth Speaks: The Eternal Validity of the Soul. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 5 indexed citations

17.

Roberts, Jane. (1970). An Inventory of Early Guthlac Materials. Mediaeval Studies. 32. 193–233. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact