Giang Long Bach
About
In The Last Decade
Giang Long Bach
11 papers receiving 385 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Biomaterials 168
- Food Science 87
- Plant Science 81
- Molecular Biology 57
- Biomedical Engineering 55
Countries citing papers authored by Giang Long Bach
This map shows the geographic impact of Giang Long Bach's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giang Long Bach with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giang Long Bach more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giang Long Bach
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giang Long Bach. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giang Long Bach. The network helps show where Giang Long Bach may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giang Long Bach
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giang Long Bach. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giang Long Bach based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giang Long Bach. Giang Long Bach is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 39 | |
| 4 | 36 | |
| 5 | 116 | |
| 6 | 110 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 36 | |
| 11 | 11 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.