Giacomo Boscia
- Ophthalmology top 2%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Francesco BosciaPasquale ViggianoGiovanni AlessioEnrico BorrelliPaola MaroloMaria Oliva GrassiRaffaele NuzziAntonio Maria Fea
- Topics
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments (42 papers)Retinal Imaging and Analysis (31 papers)Glaucoma and retinal disorders (22 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaScientific ReportsInternational Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Partner nations
- ItalyUnited StatesBelarus
In The Last Decade
Giacomo Boscia
49 papers receiving 286 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Ophthalmology 231
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 190
- Molecular Biology 36
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 23
- Epidemiology 14
Countries citing papers authored by Giacomo Boscia
This map shows the geographic impact of Giacomo Boscia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Giacomo Boscia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Giacomo Boscia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Giacomo Boscia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Giacomo Boscia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Giacomo Boscia. The network helps show where Giacomo Boscia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Giacomo Boscia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Giacomo Boscia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Giacomo Boscia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Giacomo Boscia. Giacomo Boscia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 3 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Giacomo Boscia
Giacomo Boscia is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Neurology, having authored 55 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Retinal Diseases and Treatments (42 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (31 papers) and Glaucoma and retinal disorders (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (231 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (190 citations) and Pharmaceutical Science (9 citations). Giacomo Boscia has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Belarus. Frequent co-authors include Francesco Boscia, Pasquale Viggiano, Giovanni Alessio, Enrico Borrelli, Paola Marolo, Maria Oliva Grassi, Raffaele Nuzzi, Antonio Maria Fea, Federica Evangelista and Michele Reibaldi. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Scientific Reports and International Journal of Molecular Sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.