Antonio Maria Fea
- Ophthalmology top 0.5%
- Glaucoma and retinal disorders 32
- Retinal Diseases and Treatments 18
- Ocular Infections and Treatments 4
- Intraocular Surgery and Lenses 4
-
- Corneal surgery and disorders 19
- Retinal Imaging and Analysis 4
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine top 10%
- Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders 4
-
- Ocular Surface and Contact Lens 12
Antonio Maria Fea
38 papers receiving 967 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Ophthalmology 921
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 768
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 127
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 167
- Pharmaceutical Science 23
Countries citing papers authored by Antonio Maria Fea
This map shows the geographic impact of Antonio Maria Fea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Antonio Maria Fea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Antonio Maria Fea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Antonio Maria Fea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Antonio Maria Fea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Antonio Maria Fea. The network helps show where Antonio Maria Fea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Antonio Maria Fea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 41 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2020 | 65 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 26 | |
| 15 | 2018 | 67 | |
| 16 | Minimally-invasive glaucoma surgeries (MIGS) for open angle glaucoma: A systematic review and meta-analysisbreakdown → | 2017 | 317 |
| 17 | COMPARISON BETWEEN ENDHOTELIAL CELL LOSS AFTER EXPRESS IMPLANT AND MICS, PHACO MICS SAFE-TRABECULECTOMY AND PHACO WITH HYDRUS IMPLANT | 2014 | 1 |
| 18 | Long-term Outcomes of a Prospective, Randomized, Double-Masked Study of Micro-Invasive Glaucoma Surgery (MIGS) with Trabecular Micro-Bypass Stent and Cataract Surgery vs. Cataract Surgery Alone | 2012 | 1 |
| 19 | 2008 | 4 | |
| 20 | 2005 | 1 |
About Antonio Maria Fea
Antonio Maria Fea is a scholar working on Ophthalmology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 40 papers that have together received 992 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Glaucoma and retinal disorders (32 papers), Corneal surgery and disorders (19 papers), Retinal Diseases and Treatments (18 papers), Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (12 papers), Retinal Imaging and Analysis (4 papers), Ocular Infections and Treatments (4 papers), Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders (4 papers) and Intraocular Surgery and Lenses (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Ophthalmology (921 citations), Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging (768 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (127 citations). Antonio Maria Fea has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Carlo Lavia, Laura Dallorto, Manuela Ceccarelli, Milena Maule, Teresa Rolle, Giulia Consolandi, Carl Erb, Lilit Voskanyan, Jane Ellen Giamporcaro and Giulia Pignata. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, International Journal of Molecular Sciences and American Journal of Ophthalmology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.