Gerda Fouché
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Food Science top 10%
- Pharmacology top 5%
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jeremiah SenabePriyen PillayMatthias HamburgerPaul A. SteenkampMarcel KaiserOlubunmi Abosede WintolaVinesh MaharajAnthony Jide Afolayan
- Topics
- Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers)Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (5 papers)Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- South AfricaSwitzerlandColombia
In The Last Decade
Gerda Fouché
26 papers receiving 632 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 68
- Plant Science 295
- Molecular Biology 238
- Food Science 127
- Pharmacology 88
- Complementary and alternative medicine 80
Countries citing papers authored by Gerda Fouché
This map shows the geographic impact of Gerda Fouché's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gerda Fouché with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gerda Fouché more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gerda Fouché
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gerda Fouché. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gerda Fouché. The network helps show where Gerda Fouché may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gerda Fouché
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gerda Fouché. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gerda Fouché based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gerda Fouché. Gerda Fouché is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 11 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 52 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 24 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 33 | |
| 18 | 226 | |
| 19 | Ten years of bioprospecting activities at the CSIR: BP4 as a model | 2 |
| 20 | Agro-processing opportunities identified through a novel mosquito repellent from a medicinal plant | 2 |
About Gerda Fouché
Gerda Fouché is a scholar working on Parasitology, Insect Science and Complementary and alternative medicine, having authored 27 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect Pest Control Strategies (5 papers), Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins (5 papers) and Phytochemistry and Bioactive Compounds (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (88 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (80 citations) and Toxicology (29 citations). Gerda Fouché has collaborated with scholars based in South Africa, Switzerland and Colombia. Frequent co-authors include Jeremiah Senabe, Priyen Pillay, Matthias Hamburger, Paul A. Steenkamp, Marcel Kaiser, Olubunmi Abosede Wintola, Vinesh Maharaj, Anthony Jide Afolayan, Vanessa Steenkamp and Stefanie Zimmermann. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, Molecules and Journal of Ethnopharmacology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.