Karin Hummel

979 total citations
21 papers, 526 citations indexed

About

Karin Hummel is a scholar working on Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Karin Hummel has authored 21 papers receiving a total of 526 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Physiology, 11 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 9 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Karin Hummel's work include Smoking Behavior and Cessation (18 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (11 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers). Karin Hummel is often cited by papers focused on Smoking Behavior and Cessation (18 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (11 papers) and Behavioral Health and Interventions (9 papers). Karin Hummel collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Canada and United Kingdom. Karin Hummel's co-authors include Hein de Vries, Gera E. Nagelhout, Marc C. Willemsen, Geoffrey T. Fong, Bas van den Putte, Paul Lemmens, Eileen Kaner, Moniek C.M. de Goeij, Ron Borland and Math J. J. M. Candel and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health and BMC Public Health.

In The Last Decade

Karin Hummel

21 papers receiving 512 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Karin Hummel Netherlands	10	338	216	113	86	56	21	526
Bárbara Piñeiro Spain	13	373 1.1×	125 0.6×	181 1.6×	100 1.2×	64 1.1×	32	555
Delvon T. Mattingly United States	13	323 1.0×	131 0.6×	68 0.6×	68 0.8×	75 1.3×	52	573
Shawn O’Connor Canada	12	324 1.0×	147 0.7×	74 0.7×	43 0.5×	59 1.1×	21	471
Michelle T. Bover Manderski United States	16	573 1.7×	212 1.0×	195 1.7×	83 1.0×	60 1.1×	55	793
Pamela K. Pletsch United States	15	280 0.8×	180 0.8×	57 0.5×	142 1.7×	46 0.8×	27	534
Lisa Cowap United Kingdom	12	175 0.5×	226 1.0×	71 0.6×	103 1.2×	30 0.5×	23	424
Shanna Cox United States	9	639 1.9×	270 1.3×	173 1.5×	53 0.6×	36 0.6×	10	772
Lea Maes Belgium	12	232 0.7×	200 0.9×	85 0.8×	140 1.6×	31 0.6×	21	453
Abigail C. Halperin United States	11	237 0.7×	102 0.5×	90 0.8×	95 1.1×	43 0.8×	16	397
Robin Burkhalter Canada	16	425 1.3×	233 1.1×	94 0.8×	117 1.4×	104 1.9×	37	772

Countries citing papers authored by Karin Hummel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Karin Hummel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Karin Hummel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Karin Hummel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Karin Hummel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Karin Hummel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Karin Hummel. The network helps show where Karin Hummel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Karin Hummel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Karin Hummel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Karin Hummel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Karin Hummel. Karin Hummel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Hummel, Karin, Bas van den Putte, Ute Mons, et al.. (2019). The role of income and psychological distress in the relationshipbetween work loss and smoking cessation: Findings from threeInternational Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe countries. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation. 5(November). 42–42. 2 indexed citations

Passos, Valéria Lima, et al.. (2019). Dynamic, data-driven typologies of long-term smoking, cessation, and their correlates: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. Social Science & Medicine. 235. 112393–112393. 3 indexed citations

Nagelhout, Gera E., et al.. (2019). Did E-Cigarette Users Notice the New European Union’s E-Cigarette Legislation? Findings from the 2015–2017 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 16(16). 2917–2917. 2 indexed citations

Zatoński, Mateusz, Aleksandra Herbeć, Witold Zatoński, et al.. (2018). Characterising smokers of menthol and flavoured cigarettes,their attitudes towards tobacco regulation, and the anticipatedimpact of the Tobacco Products Directive on their smoking andquitting behaviours: The EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 16(2). A4–A4. 30 indexed citations

Brand, Floor A van den, Gera E. Nagelhout, Karin Hummel, et al.. (2018). Does free or lower cost smoking cessation medication stimulate quitting? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands and UK Surveys. Tobacco Control. 28(Suppl 1). s61–s67. 3 indexed citations

Hummel, Karin, Gera E. Nagelhout, Geoffrey T. Fong, et al.. (2018). Quitting activity and use of cessation assistance reported by smokers in eight European countries: Findings from the EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Tobacco Induced Diseases. 16(2). 27 indexed citations

Guignard, Romain, Karine Gallopel‐Morvan, Ute Mons, Karin Hummel, & Viêt Nguyen‐Thanh. (2018). Impact of a negative emotional antitobacco mass media campaign on French smokers: a longitudinal study. Tobacco Control. 27(6). 670–676. 5 indexed citations

Candel, Math J. J. M., Gera E. Nagelhout, Marc C. Willemsen, et al.. (2018). Support for a point-of-sale cigarette display ban among smokers: findings from the international tobacco control (ITC) Netherlands survey. BMC Public Health. 18(1). 2 indexed citations

Hummel, Karin, et al.. (2017). Electronic cigarette use: comparing smokers, vapers, and dual users on characteristics and motivational factors. Tobacco Prevention & Cessation. 3(April). 8–8. 9 indexed citations

10.

Nagelhout, Gera E., Karin Hummel, Moniek C.M. de Goeij, et al.. (2017). How economic recessions and unemployment affect illegal drug use: A systematic realist literature review. International Journal of Drug Policy. 44. 69–83. 104 indexed citations

11.

Hummel, Karin, Marc C. Willemsen, Hein de Vries, Karin Monshouwer, & Gera E. Nagelhout. (2016). Social Acceptance of Smoking Restrictions During 10 Years of Policy Implementation, Reversal, and Reenactment in the Netherlands: Findings From a National Population Survey. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. 19(2). 231–238. 2 indexed citations

12.

Hummel, Karin, Jamie Brown, Marc C. Willemsen, Robert West, & Daniel Kotz. (2016). External validation of the Motivation To Stop Scale (MTSS): findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. European Journal of Public Health. 27(1). ckw105–ckw105. 28 indexed citations

13.

Nagelhout, Gera E., Mark de Rooij, Pete Driezen, et al.. (2016). Attrition analysed in five waves of a longitudinal yearly survey of smokers: findings from the ITC Netherlands survey. European Journal of Public Health. 26(4). 693–699. 24 indexed citations

14.

Hummel, Karin, Gera E. Nagelhout, Marc C. Willemsen, et al.. (2015). Trends and socioeconomic differences in policy triggers for thinking about quitting smoking: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Europe Surveys. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 155. 154–162. 9 indexed citations

15.

Willemsen, M. C., Ute Mons, Bas van den Putte, et al.. (2015). Educational differences in associations of noticing anti-tobacco information with smoking-related attitudes and quit intentions: findings from the International Tobacco Control Europe Surveys. Health Education Research. 30(5). 719–730. 7 indexed citations

16.

Nagelhout, Gera E., K. Michael Cummings, Marc C. Willemsen, et al.. (2015). E-cigarette advertisements, and associations with the use of e-cigarettes and disapproval or quitting of smoking: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. International Journal of Drug Policy. 29. 73–79. 16 indexed citations

17.

Hummel, Karin, Ciska Hoving, Gera E. Nagelhout, et al.. (2014). Prevalence and reasons for use of electronic cigarettes among smokers: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. International Journal of Drug Policy. 26(6). 601–608. 53 indexed citations

18.

Gravely, Shannon, Geoffrey T. Fong, K. Michael Cummings, et al.. (2014). Awareness, Trial, and Current Use of Electronic Cigarettes in 10 Countries: Findings from the ITC Project. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 11(11). 11691–11704. 130 indexed citations

19.

Nagelhout, Gera E., Karin Hummel, Marc C. Willemsen, et al.. (2014). Are there income differences in the impact of a national reimbursement policy for smoking cessation treatment and accompanying media attention? Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Netherlands Survey. Drug and Alcohol Dependence. 140. 183–190. 7 indexed citations

20.

Gerards, Sanne, Karin Hummel, Pieter C. Dagnelie, Nanné K. de Vries, & Stef Kremers. (2013). Parental self-efficacy in childhood overweight: validation of the Lifestyle Behavior Checklist in the Netherlands. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 10(1). 7–7. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact