Georges Dicker
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Philosophy and History of Science
- History of Science and Medicine
- Philosophy top 2%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought
Papers in
- Philosophy 19
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 8
- Classical Philosophy and Thought 7
- Medieval and Classical Philosophy 4
- Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 3
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science 9
- Philosophy, Science, and History 2
Georges Dicker
27 papers receiving 121 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- History and Philosophy of Science 66
- Philosophy 112
- General Psychology 7
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 54
- General Social Sciences 5
Countries citing papers authored by Georges Dicker
This map shows the geographic impact of Georges Dicker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Georges Dicker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Georges Dicker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Georges Dicker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Georges Dicker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Georges Dicker. The network helps show where Georges Dicker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 1 scholars most cited alongside Georges Dicker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 28 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2004 | 21 | |
| 2 | 1996 | 17 | |
| 3 | Hume's Epistemology and Metaphysics: An Introduction | 1998 | 16 |
| 4 | 2008 | 13 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 7 | 2005 | 9 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 8 | |
| 9 | Perceptual Knowledge: An Analytical and Historical Study | 1980 | 6 |
| 10 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 11 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 12 | 2002 | 4 | |
| 13 | John Dewey: Instrumentalism in Social Action | 1971 | 3 |
| 14 | Leibniz on Necessary and Contingent Propositions | 1982 | 3 |
| 15 | 2007 | 3 | |
| 16 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 17 | 1973 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1977 | 3 | |
| 19 | 1980 | 3 | |
| 20 | John Dewey on the Object of Knowledge | 1972 | 2 |
About Georges Dicker
Georges Dicker is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 28 papers that have together received 155 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Philosophy and Science (9 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (7 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (6 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (4 papers), Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (3 papers), Philosophy, Science, and History (2 papers) and Diverse Music Education Insights (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (66 citations), Philosophy (112 citations), General Psychology (7 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (54 citations) and General Social Sciences (5 citations). Georges Dicker has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Fumerton. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Faith and Philosophy, The Southern Journal of Philosophy, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.