James R. O’Shea
- Philosophy top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Sociology and Political Science
- Topics
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaSyntheseBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy
- Partner nations
- IrelandUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
James R. O’Shea
22 papers receiving 135 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 36
- Philosophy 95
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 72
- History and Philosophy of Science 58
- Cognitive Neuroscience 24
- Sociology and Political Science 18
Countries citing papers authored by James R. O’Shea
This map shows the geographic impact of James R. O’Shea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. O’Shea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. O’Shea more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James R. O’Shea
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. O’Shea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. O’Shea. The network helps show where James R. O’Shea may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. O’Shea
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. O’Shea. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. O’Shea based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James R. O’Shea. James R. O’Shea is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | O'Shea, J. (2019) Review of Dennis Schulting, _Kantian Nonconceptualism_ (Palgrave 2016), in Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews (online). | 0 |
| 4 | Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: A Critical Guide | 5 |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | Prospects for a Stereoscopic Vision of our Thinking Nature: On Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan | 1 |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | Kant's Critique of Pure Reason: An Introduction | 1 |
| 14 | ‘Conceptual Thinking and Nonconceptual Content: A Sellarsian Divide’ | 1 |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | Self, Language, and World: Problems from Kant, Sellars, and Rosenberg | 12 |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Wilfrid Sellars: Naturalism with a Normative Turn | 50 |
| 19 | 11 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About James R. O’Shea
James R. O’Shea is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Philosophy and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 149 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy and Theoretical Science (7 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (5 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (58 citations), Philosophy (95 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (72 citations). James R. O’Shea has collaborated with scholars based in Ireland, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Eric M. Rubenstein, Kate Gillespie, Michael Duffy and John McDowell. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Synthese and Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.