George W. Buchman
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 10%
- Food Science top 5%
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Co-authors
- J N HansenSubhashis BanerjeeE. S. KovalevaAyoub RashtchianMichael E. ScharfJames H. CampbellDavid M. SchusterMark Berninger
- Topics
- Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers)Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers)
- Cited by
- VirologyInsect ScienceBiotechnology
- Journals
- Nucleic Acids ResearchJournal of Biological ChemistryApplied and Environmental Microbiology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustriaNorway
In The Last Decade
George W. Buchman
24 papers receiving 836 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- Molecular Biology 448
- Genetics 259
- Food Science 210
- Insect Science 169
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 125
Countries citing papers authored by George W. Buchman
This map shows the geographic impact of George W. Buchman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George W. Buchman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George W. Buchman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George W. Buchman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George W. Buchman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George W. Buchman. The network helps show where George W. Buchman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George W. Buchman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George W. Buchman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George W. Buchman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George W. Buchman. George W. Buchman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 25 | |
| 8 | 54 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 31 | |
| 11 | 75 | |
| 12 | 83 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 61 | |
| 15 | 13 | |
| 16 | 13 | |
| 17 | 11 | |
| 18 | 73 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 273 |
About George W. Buchman
George W. Buchman is a scholar working on Virology, Genetics and Biotechnology, having authored 24 papers that have together received 871 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Virus-based gene therapy research (6 papers), Cervical Cancer and HPV Research (4 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Virology (97 citations), Insect Science (169 citations) and Biotechnology (103 citations). George W. Buchman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Austria and Norway. Frequent co-authors include J N Hansen, Subhashis Banerjee, E. S. Kovaleva, Ayoub Rashtchian, Michael E. Scharf, James H. Campbell, David M. Schuster, Mark Berninger, Amit Sethi and Jeffrey M. Slack. Their work appears in journals such as Nucleic Acids Research, Journal of Biological Chemistry and Applied and Environmental Microbiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.