George F. Michel

4.5k total citations
93 papers, 2.9k citations indexed

About

George F. Michel is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, George F. Michel has authored 93 papers receiving a total of 2.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 60 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 58 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 14 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in George F. Michel's work include Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (52 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (50 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (21 papers). George F. Michel is often cited by papers focused on Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (52 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (50 papers) and Hearing Impairment and Communication (21 papers). George F. Michel collaborates with scholars based in United States, Taiwan and Canada. George F. Michel's co-authors include Debra A. Harkins, Julie M. Campbell, Ching‐Fan Sheu, Iryna Babik, Celia Moore, Peter H. Wolff, Eliza L. Nelson, Claudio L. Ferre, Emily C. Marcinowski and Jane Coryell and has published in prestigious journals such as Science, Child Development and Annals of Surgery.

In The Last Decade

George F. Michel

91 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
George F. Michel United States 33 2.0k 1.8k 675 311 283 93 2.9k
Jacqueline Fagard France 26 1.2k 0.6× 1.0k 0.6× 436 0.6× 247 0.8× 132 0.5× 88 1.8k
Christine Deruelle France 31 2.7k 1.4× 922 0.5× 635 0.9× 101 0.3× 299 1.1× 94 3.5k
Sandra F. Witelson Canada 25 3.2k 1.6× 997 0.6× 498 0.7× 745 2.4× 316 1.1× 41 4.9k
John Wattam-Bell United Kingdom 28 2.4k 1.2× 500 0.3× 218 0.3× 266 0.9× 132 0.5× 85 3.2k
Clare Porac Canada 31 3.4k 1.7× 734 0.4× 686 1.0× 101 0.3× 573 2.0× 93 4.2k
Jacqueline Liederman United States 22 1.3k 0.6× 590 0.3× 167 0.2× 279 0.9× 101 0.4× 60 1.8k
Terri L. Lewis Canada 43 2.9k 1.5× 397 0.2× 475 0.7× 393 1.3× 110 0.4× 141 4.9k
Markus Hausmann United Kingdom 39 2.7k 1.4× 414 0.2× 669 1.0× 84 0.3× 219 0.8× 113 4.3k
Christine Chiarello United States 34 3.0k 1.5× 1.2k 0.7× 413 0.6× 152 0.5× 39 0.1× 88 3.6k
Brian Hopkins Netherlands 32 910 0.5× 915 0.5× 510 0.8× 918 3.0× 116 0.4× 128 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by George F. Michel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George F. Michel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George F. Michel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George F. Michel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George F. Michel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George F. Michel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George F. Michel. The network helps show where George F. Michel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George F. Michel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George F. Michel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George F. Michel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George F. Michel. George F. Michel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Campbell, Julie M., et al.. (2025). Infant manipulation complexity trajectories as predictors of language outcomes at 2 years of age. Infant Behavior and Development. 80. 102080–102080.
2.
Michel, George F., Iryna Babik, Eliza L. Nelson, et al.. (2025). Development of handedness and other lateralized functions during infancy and early childhood. Handbook of clinical neurology. 208. 181–194. 1 indexed citations
3.
Marcinowski, Emily C., George F. Michel, & Eliza L. Nelson. (2024). Object Skill Advantage in Infants with a Hand Preference. Symmetry. 16(9). 1148–1148. 1 indexed citations
4.
Bardia, Amit, et al.. (2023). Association of adherence to individual components of Society of Thoracic Surgeons cardiac surgery antibiotic guidelines and postoperative infections. Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery. 167(6). 2170–2176.e5. 2 indexed citations
5.
Sarfraz, Azza, Zouina Sarfraz, Muzna Sarfraz, et al.. (2022). THE INCIDENCE OF ALCOHOL USE DISORDERS DURING THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC. Psychiatria Danubina. 34(3). 535–543. 3 indexed citations
6.
Ferre, Claudio L., Iryna Babik, & George F. Michel. (2020). A perspective on the development of hemispheric specialization, infant handedness, and cerebral palsy. Cortex. 127. 208–220. 14 indexed citations
7.
8.
Michel, George F.. (2018). Development of Role-Differentiated Bimanual Manipulation in Infancy: Part 1. The Influence of Hand-use Preferences for the Acquisition of Objects.. NC Digital Online Collection of Knowledge and Scholarship (The University of North Carolina at Greensboro). 1 indexed citations
9.
Babik, Iryna & George F. Michel. (2015). Development of role‐differentiated bimanual manipulation in infancy: Part 1. The emergence of the skill. Developmental Psychobiology. 58(2). 243–256. 33 indexed citations
10.
Nelson, Eliza L., Julie M. Campbell, & George F. Michel. (2013). Early handedness in infancy predicts language ability in toddlers.. Developmental Psychology. 50(3). 809–814. 56 indexed citations
11.
Michel, George F.. (2013). The Role of Developmental Psychobiology in the Unification of Psychology. Review of General Psychology. 17(2). 210–215. 6 indexed citations
12.
Nelson, Eliza L., Julie M. Campbell, & George F. Michel. (2013). Unimanual to bimanual: Tracking the development of handedness from 6 to 24 months. Infant Behavior and Development. 36(2). 181–188. 75 indexed citations
13.
Ferre, Claudio L., et al.. (2010). Development of role‐differentiated bimanual manipulation during the infant's first year. Developmental Psychobiology. 52(2). 168–180. 59 indexed citations
14.
Michel, George F., et al.. (2006). The manifestation of infant hand‐use preferences when reaching for objects during the seven‐ to thirteen‐month age period. Developmental Psychobiology. 48(6). 436–443. 54 indexed citations
15.
Michel, George F.. (2001). A Developmental-Psychobiological Approach to Developmental Neuropsychology. Developmental Neuropsychology. 19(1). 11–32. 13 indexed citations
16.
Michel, George F.. (1992). Maternal influences on infant hand-use during play with toys. Behavior Genetics. 22(2). 163–176. 32 indexed citations
17.
Michel, George F., et al.. (1992). Infant interest expressions as coordinative motor structures. Infant Behavior and Development. 15(3). 347–358. 32 indexed citations
18.
Michel, George F. & Celia Moore. (1986). Contributions of reproductive experience to observation-maintained crop growth and incubation in male and female ring doves. Animal Behaviour. 34(3). 790–796. 7 indexed citations
19.
Michel, George F., et al.. (1981). Head Orientation Position during Birth and in Infant Neonatal Period, and Hand Preference at Nineteen Weeks. Child Development. 52(3). 819–819. 33 indexed citations
20.
Michel, George F.. (1976). Role of mate's previous experience in ring dove hormone-induced incubation.. Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 90(5). 468–472. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jacqueline Fagard Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christine Deruelle Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Sandra F. Witelson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by John Wattam-Bell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Clare Porac Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jacqueline Liederman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Terri L. Lewis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Markus Hausmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Christine Chiarello Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Brian Hopkins
Rankless by CCL
2026