George Amato

482 citations
24 papers · 380 indexed · h-index 12
Topics
Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (10 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers)Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (4 papers)

In The Last Decade

George Amato

22 papers receiving 366 citations

Peers

George Amato
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Organic Chemistry 153
  • Molecular Biology 131
  • Pharmacology 94
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 84
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 46
Replace Ing‐Jun Chen with:
Ing‐Jun Chen Taiwan
Graham N. Maw United Kingdom
Carl D. Davis United States
Artur Świerczek Poland
Chiu‐Yin Kwan Canada
Grażyna Chłoń‐Rzepa Poland
Jae Yang Kong South Korea
Monika Kubacka Poland
Roberta Caporaso Italy
F. Carpenedo Italy
George Amato relative to Ing‐Jun Chen Taiwan Ing‐Jun Chen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Ing‐Jun Chen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by George Amato

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of George Amato's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George Amato with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George Amato more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by George Amato

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by George Amato. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George Amato. The network helps show where George Amato may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of George Amato

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George Amato. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George Amato based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George Amato. George Amato is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 3
3 1
4 15
5 2
6 9
7 4
8 24
9 19
10 17
11 9
12 41
13 39
14 1
15 23
16
RANITIDINE BISMUTH CITRATE PLUS AMOXYCILLIN AND CLARITHROMYCIN THERAPY FOR ONE WEEK IS EFFECTIVE IN ERADICATING HELICOBACTER PYLORI AND HEALING DUODENAL ULCER.
1
17
Treatment of Helicobacter Pylori infection with different doses clarithromycin combined with amoxicillin and lansoprazole.
7
18 43
19 17
20 5

About George Amato

George Amato is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Pharmacology and Sensory Systems, having authored 24 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (10 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (8 papers) and Pharmacological Receptor Mechanisms and Effects (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (94 citations), Organic Chemistry (153 citations) and Sensory Systems (26 citations). George Amato has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include David R. Williams, Jayachandra P. Reddy, Rangan Maitra, Grant McNaughton‐Smith, Nayaab S Khan, Paul C. Fritch, Alan D. Wickenden, Rosemarie Roeloffs, Khalida Shamim and Stephen M. Shaw. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, The Journal of Organic Chemistry and Molecules.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026