George A. Reisch
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.2%
- Education top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Topics
- Philosophy, Science, and History (14 papers)Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers)Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
George A. Reisch
27 papers receiving 517 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- History and Philosophy of Science 357
- Education 141
- Sociology and Political Science 131
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 88
- Philosophy 73
Countries citing papers authored by George A. Reisch
This map shows the geographic impact of George A. Reisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by George A. Reisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites George A. Reisch more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by George A. Reisch
This network shows the impact of papers produced by George A. Reisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by George A. Reisch. The network helps show where George A. Reisch may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of George A. Reisch
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of George A. Reisch. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of George A. Reisch based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with George A. Reisch. George A. Reisch is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | The Quest for Physical Theory: Problems in the Methodology of Scientific Research | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Human Knowledge: A Classic Statement of Logical Empiricism | 6 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | THEORIA. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia | 11 |
| 9 | The Rolling Stones and Philosophy: It's Just a Thought Away | 2 |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | Monty Python and Philosophy: Nudge Nudge, Think Think! | 0 |
| 12 | Bullshit and philosophy : guaranteed to get perfect results every time | 24 |
| 13 | 156 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | Popular culture and philosophy | 1 |
| 17 | 130 | |
| 18 | 19 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About George A. Reisch
George A. Reisch is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, General Psychology and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 30 papers that have together received 651 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophy, Science, and History (14 papers), Philosophy and History of Science (14 papers) and Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (357 citations), General Psychology (55 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (15 citations). George A. Reisch has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Stuart Glennan, William Irwin, Thomas Kühn and Ilkka Niiniluoto. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Philosophy of Science and History and Theory.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.