Geoffrey Robertson
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 2%
- Law top 5%
- Gender Studies
- Co-authors
- G. John IkenberryPhilip BakerStephan LandsmanGary Jonathan BassLawrence DouglasRichard J. Goldstone
- Topics
- International Law and Human Rights (4 papers)Law in Society and Culture (2 papers)Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Geoffrey Robertson
9 papers receiving 140 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Political Science and International Relations 131
- Sociology and Political Science 125
- History 59
- Law 40
- Gender Studies 14
Countries citing papers authored by Geoffrey Robertson
This map shows the geographic impact of Geoffrey Robertson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Geoffrey Robertson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Geoffrey Robertson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Geoffrey Robertson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Geoffrey Robertson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Geoffrey Robertson. The network helps show where Geoffrey Robertson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Geoffrey Robertson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Geoffrey Robertson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Geoffrey Robertson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Geoffrey Robertson. Geoffrey Robertson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | Crímenes contra la humanidad: la lucha por una justicia global | 1 |
| 4 | The putney debates : the levellers | 1 |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Crimes Against Humanity: The Struggle for Global Justice (Third Edition) | 0 |
| 7 | Ending Impunity: How International Criminal Law Can Put Tyrants on Trial | 5 |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 179 | |
| 10 | Kejahatan terhadap kemanusiaan perjuangan untuk mewujudkan keadilan global | 11 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Media law: The rights of journalists and broadcasters | 2 |
| 13 | Freedom, the individual and the law | 12 |
| 14 | People against the press: An enquiry into the Press Council | 2 |
| 15 | Obscenity: An account of censorship laws and their enforcement in England and Wales | 12 |
About Geoffrey Robertson
Geoffrey Robertson is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Law and Nature and Landscape Conservation, having authored 15 papers that have together received 231 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include International Law and Human Rights (4 papers), Law in Society and Culture (2 papers) and Global Peace and Security Dynamics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History (59 citations), Political Science and International Relations (131 citations) and Law (40 citations). Geoffrey Robertson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include G. John Ikenberry, Philip Baker, Stephan Landsman, Gary Jonathan Bass, Lawrence Douglas and Richard J. Goldstone. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Foreign Affairs and Michigan Law Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.