Robert W. Thurston
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- History top 5%
- Social Psychology
- Gender Studies
- Topics
- Eastern European Communism and Reforms (4 papers)Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (3 papers)Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Robert W. Thurston
18 papers receiving 125 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 38
- Sociology and Political Science 148
- Political Science and International Relations 125
- History 50
- Social Psychology 28
- Gender Studies 12
Countries citing papers authored by Robert W. Thurston
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert W. Thurston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert W. Thurston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert W. Thurston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert W. Thurston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert W. Thurston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert W. Thurston. The network helps show where Robert W. Thurston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert W. Thurston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert W. Thurston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert W. Thurston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert W. Thurston. Robert W. Thurston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | Coffee : a condensed history | 1 |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | Witch, wicce, Mother Goose : the rise and fall of the witch hunts in Europe and North America | 1 |
| 7 | The Witch Hunts: A History of the Witch Persecutions in Europe and North America | 5 |
| 8 | 35 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 85 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1492: Conquest of Paradise | 1 |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | Midrash and "magnet" words in the New Testament | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Robert W. Thurston
Robert W. Thurston is a scholar working on Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 26 papers that have together received 225 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eastern European Communism and Reforms (4 papers), Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration (3 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (125 citations), History (50 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (148 citations). Robert W. Thurston has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Z. Goldman, Abbott Gleason, Sheila Fitzpatrick, Michael Jakobson and Jonathan Morris. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, The Journal of Interdisciplinary History and The Russian Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.