G.C. Lim

3.6k citations
95 papers · 2.9k indexed · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

G.C. Lim

93 papers receiving 2.7k citations

Peers

G.C. Lim
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Condensed Matter Physics 783
  • Computational Mechanics 929
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 538
  • Biomedical Engineering 897
  • Mechanical Engineering 716
Replace R.C.Y. Auyeung with:
R.C.Y. Auyeung United States
L. M. Kukreja India
Markus Rettenmayr Germany
Yoosuf N. Picard United States
P. Panjan Slovenia
Michael F. Becker United States
T. T. Sheng United States
P.J. McNally Ireland
C. A. Ross United States
I. C. Noyan United States
G.C. Lim relative to R.C.Y. Auyeung United States R.C.Y. Auyeung's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
R.C.Y. Auyeung · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G.C. Lim

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G.C. Lim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G.C. Lim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G.C. Lim more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G.C. Lim

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G.C. Lim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G.C. Lim. The network helps show where G.C. Lim may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G.C. Lim, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G.C. Lim Line = papers co-authored together G.C. Lim links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 95 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1987222
2 1987187
3 1987147
4 2010147
5 1987136
6 1987115
7 2009100
8 200498
9 201095
10 198771
11 200470
12 200370
13 201267
14 201361
15 200458
16 200457
17 201555
18 201654
19 200748
20 201447

About G.C. Lim

G.C. Lim is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics and Materials Chemistry, having authored 95 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Laser Material Processing Techniques (38 papers), Advanced Surface Polishing Techniques (19 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (10 papers), Semiconductor materials and interfaces (8 papers), Advanced machining processes and optimization (7 papers), Laser Design and Applications (7 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (7 papers) and Surface Roughness and Optical Measurements (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (783 citations), Computational Mechanics (929 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (538 citations), Biomedical Engineering (897 citations) and Mechanical Engineering (716 citations). G.C. Lim has collaborated with scholars based in Singapore, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Hongyu Zheng, E. M. Engler, M. L. Ramirez, Hong Zheng, J. E. Vazquez, S. Parkin, R. Beyers, P. M. Grant, R. Savoy and V. Y. Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Surface Science, Applied Physics Letters, Optics and Lasers in Engineering, Journal of Laser Applications and The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact