Genís Oña
Impact in
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies
- Biological Psychiatry top 10%
- Tryptophan and brain disorders
Papers in
-
- Psychedelics and Drug Studies 32
- Pharmacology 17
- Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research 16
- Co-authors
- José Carlos Bouso (29 shared papers)Rafael G. dos Santos (17 shared papers)Jaime E. C. Hallak (16 shared papers)Miguel Ángel Alcázar‐Córcoles (11 shared papers)Juliana Mendes Rocha (7 shared papers)Giordano Novak Rossi (7 shared papers)María Teresa Colomina (3 shared papers)Dóra Révész (3 shared papers)
In The Last Decade
Genís Oña
36 papers receiving 440 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 70
- Clinical Psychology 378
- Biological Psychiatry 34
- Nutrition and Dietetics 142
- Toxicology 25
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 118
Countries citing papers authored by Genís Oña
This map shows the geographic impact of Genís Oña's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genís Oña with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genís Oña more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Genís Oña
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Genís Oña. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Genís Oña. The network helps show where Genís Oña may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Genís Oña, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2020 | 76 | |
| 2 | 2019 | 53 | |
| 3 | 2020 | 38 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 24 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 22 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 21 | |
| 7 | 2020 | 16 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 16 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2019 | 15 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 15 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 14 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 14 | 2021 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2022 | 10 | |
| 16 | 2020 | 9 | |
| 17 | 2019 | 9 | |
| 18 | 2023 | 9 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 20 | 2021 | 7 |
About Genís Oña
Genís Oña is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacology, Nutrition and Dietetics, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Organic Chemistry, having authored 40 papers that have together received 451 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychedelics and Drug Studies (32 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (16 papers), Biochemical Analysis and Sensing Techniques (13 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (10 papers), Chemical synthesis and alkaloids (8 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (4 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (3 papers) and Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (378 citations), Biological Psychiatry (34 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (142 citations), Toxicology (25 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (118 citations). Genís Oña has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, Brazil and Denmark. Frequent co-authors include José Carlos Bouso, Rafael G. dos Santos, Jaime E. C. Hallak, Miguel Ángel Alcázar‐Córcoles, Juliana Mendes Rocha, Giordano Novak Rossi, María Teresa Colomina, Dóra Révész, Maurı́cio Yonamine and Gabriela de Oliveira Silveira. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Psychiatry, Current Medicinal Chemistry, Journal of Psychoactive Drugs and Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.