Genevieve C. Alexander

3.9k total citations · 1 hit paper
34 papers, 3.1k citations indexed

About

Genevieve C. Alexander is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Speech and Hearing and Sensory Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Genevieve C. Alexander has authored 34 papers receiving a total of 3.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 25 papers in Speech and Hearing and 13 papers in Sensory Systems. Recurrent topics in Genevieve C. Alexander's work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (32 papers), Noise Effects and Management (25 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers). Genevieve C. Alexander is often cited by papers focused on Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (32 papers), Noise Effects and Management (25 papers) and Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (13 papers). Genevieve C. Alexander collaborates with scholars based in United States, Sweden and Canada. Genevieve C. Alexander's co-authors include Robyn M. Cox, Ginger A. Gray, Jani Johnson, Sherri L. Smith, M. Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller, Jingjing Xu, Rachel A. McArdle, Gene W. Bratt, Todd A. Ricketts and Theresa H. Chisolm and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research and Ear and Hearing.

In The Last Decade

Genevieve C. Alexander

34 papers receiving 2.9k citations

Hit Papers

The Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit 1995 2026 2005 2015 1995 250 500 750

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Genevieve C. Alexander United States 23 2.8k 2.0k 1.3k 644 429 34 3.1k
Robyn M. Cox United States 38 4.3k 1.5× 3.1k 1.5× 1.9k 1.5× 968 1.5× 786 1.8× 99 4.7k
Ruth A. Bentler United States 29 2.8k 1.0× 1.7k 0.9× 1.2k 0.9× 762 1.2× 785 1.8× 105 3.2k
Fred H. Bess United States 35 3.1k 1.1× 1.4k 0.7× 1.9k 1.5× 1.2k 1.8× 225 0.5× 100 4.2k
Cas Smits Netherlands 30 2.2k 0.8× 1.6k 0.8× 1.3k 1.0× 207 0.3× 455 1.1× 83 2.6k
Richard C. Seewald Canada 26 1.9k 0.7× 910 0.5× 899 0.7× 394 0.6× 614 1.4× 60 2.1k
Susan Scollie Canada 29 2.3k 0.8× 952 0.5× 1.1k 0.8× 436 0.7× 791 1.8× 120 2.5k
Teresa A. Zwolan United States 30 2.4k 0.9× 833 0.4× 1.4k 1.1× 780 1.2× 414 1.0× 72 2.7k
Benjamin W. Y. Hornsby United States 27 2.7k 1.0× 1.7k 0.9× 909 0.7× 497 0.8× 557 1.3× 71 3.0k
Sue Archbold United Kingdom 32 2.5k 0.9× 619 0.3× 979 0.8× 1.7k 2.6× 186 0.4× 68 3.0k
Philip Newall Australia 19 1.7k 0.6× 940 0.5× 1.2k 0.9× 273 0.4× 152 0.4× 39 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Genevieve C. Alexander

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Genevieve C. Alexander's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Genevieve C. Alexander with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Genevieve C. Alexander more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Genevieve C. Alexander

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Genevieve C. Alexander. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Genevieve C. Alexander. The network helps show where Genevieve C. Alexander may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Genevieve C. Alexander

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Genevieve C. Alexander. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Genevieve C. Alexander based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Genevieve C. Alexander. Genevieve C. Alexander is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Sherri L., M. Kathleen Pichora‐Fuller, & Genevieve C. Alexander. (2016). Development of the Word Auditory Recognition and Recall Measure: A Working Memory Test for Use in Rehabilitative Audiology. Ear and Hearing. 37(6). e360–e376. 39 indexed citations
2.
Cox, Robyn M., Genevieve C. Alexander, & Jingjing Xu. (2014). Development of the Device-Oriented Subjective Outcome (DOSO) Scale. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 25(8). 727–736. 15 indexed citations
3.
Smith, Sherri L., Todd A. Ricketts, Rachel A. McArdle, et al.. (2013). Style Preference Survey: A Report on the Psychometric Properties and a Cross-Validation Experiment. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 24(2). 89–104. 2 indexed citations
4.
Cox, Robyn M., et al.. (2011). Cochlear Dead Regions in Typical Hearing Aid Candidates: Prevalence and Implications for Use of High-Frequency Speech Cues. Ear and Hearing. 32(3). 339–348. 38 indexed citations
5.
Cox, Robyn M., et al.. (2010). Preference for One or Two Hearing Aids Among Adult Patients. Ear and Hearing. 32(2). 181–197. 37 indexed citations
6.
Johnson, Jani, Robyn M. Cox, & Genevieve C. Alexander. (2009). Development of APHAB Norms for WDRC Hearing Aids and Comparisons with Original Norms. Ear and Hearing. 31(1). 47–55. 69 indexed citations
7.
Smith, Sherri L., et al.. (2009). Evaluation of the International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids in a Veteran Sample. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 20(6). 374–380. 23 indexed citations
8.
Cox, Robyn M., Genevieve C. Alexander, & Ginger A. Gray. (2005). Hearing Aid Patients in Private Practice and Public Health (Veterans Affairs) Clinics: Are They Different?. Ear and Hearing. 26(6). 513–528. 29 indexed citations
10.
Cox, Robyn M. & Genevieve C. Alexander. (2001). Validation of the SADL Questionnaire. Ear and Hearing. 22(2). 151–160. 81 indexed citations
11.
Cox, Robyn M. & Genevieve C. Alexander. (2000). Expectations About Hearing Aids and Their Relationship to Fitting Outcome. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 11(7). 368–382. 99 indexed citations
12.
Cox, Robyn M., Genevieve C. Alexander, & Ginger A. Gray. (1999). Personality and the Subjective Assessment of Hearing Aids. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 10(1). 1–13. 53 indexed citations
13.
Cox, Robyn M. & Genevieve C. Alexander. (1999). Measuring Satisfaction with Amplification in Daily Life: The SADL Scale. Ear and Hearing. 20(4). 306–320. 272 indexed citations
14.
Cox, Robyn M., et al.. (1997). The Contour Test of Loudness Perception. Ear and Hearing. 18(5). 388–400. 143 indexed citations
15.
Cox, Robyn M. & Genevieve C. Alexander. (1991). Preferred Hearing Aid Environments Gain in Everyday. Ear and Hearing. 12(2). 123–126. 9 indexed citations
16.
Cox, Robyn M., et al.. (1991). Comparison of Objective and Subjective Measures of Speech Intelligibility in Elderly Hearing-Impaired Listeners. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research. 34(4). 904–915. 38 indexed citations
17.
Cox, Robyn M., et al.. (1991). Comparison of two questionnaires for patient-assessed hearing aid benefit.. PubMed. 2(3). 134–45. 45 indexed citations
18.
Cox, Robyn M. & Genevieve C. Alexander. (1991). Hearing Aid Benefit in Everyday Environments. Ear and Hearing. 12(2). 127–139. 21 indexed citations
19.
Cox, Robyn M., et al.. (1987). Development of the Connected Speech Test (CST). Ear and Hearing. 8(SUPPLEMENT). 119s–119s. 245 indexed citations
20.
Cox, Robyn M., et al.. (1987). Intelligibility of average talkers in typical listening environments. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 81(5). 1598–1608. 52 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026