Gene Schmidt

459 citations
26 papers · 290 indexed · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Gene Schmidt

21 papers receiving 233 citations

Peers

Gene Schmidt
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 130
  • Geology 18
  • Space and Planetary Science 4
  • Atmospheric Science 56
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 18
Replace C. M. Phillips-Lander with:
C. M. Phillips-Lander United States
Jesse Tarnas United States
Craig H. Moore United States
James Leong United States
M. T. Thorpe United States
Emily Stewart United States
E. S. Amador United States
Sheree J. Watson United States
Gene Schmidt relative to C. M. Phillips-Lander United States C. M. Phillips-Lander's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
C. M. Phillips-Lander · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gene Schmidt

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gene Schmidt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene Schmidt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene Schmidt more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gene Schmidt

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene Schmidt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene Schmidt. The network helps show where Gene Schmidt may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gene Schmidt, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gene Schmidt Line = papers co-authored together Gene Schmidt links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 26 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 197392
2 201961
3 201921
4 202214
5 200514
6 202113
7 201813
8 199512
9 20237
10 20236
11 20026
12 20226
13 20024
14 20033
15 20023
16 20073
17 20083
18
Structure and geometry of the Interior Layered Deposits within Hebes Chasma, Valles Marineris, Mars
20142
19 19752
20 20241

About Gene Schmidt

Gene Schmidt is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Atmospheric Science, Safety Research, Aerospace Engineering and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 26 papers that have together received 290 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Planetary Science and Exploration (13 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (11 papers), Geology and Paleoclimatology Research (5 papers), Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life (4 papers), Forensic Fingerprint Detection Methods (3 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (3 papers), Petroleum Processing and Analysis (3 papers) and Microbial bioremediation and biosurfactants (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Astronomy and Astrophysics (130 citations), Geology (18 citations), Space and Planetary Science (4 citations), Atmospheric Science (56 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (18 citations). Gene Schmidt has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include M. Pondrelli, F. Salese, G. G. Ori, Richard W. Hurst, Francesco Salvini, Angelo Pio Rossi, Ernst Hauber, Gary J. Brewer, L. Le Deit and Frank Fueten. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Planets, Environmental Forensics, AAPG Bulletin, Tectonophysics and Remote Sensing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact