Gene C. Jamieson
- Molecular Biology
- Plant Science top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Insect Science top 2%
- Genetics top 10%
- Co-authors
- David A. SchooleyDavid RhodesCharles A. MillerGlenn McEnroeRobert M. ScarboroughSven KrämerCarol C. ReuterRobert D. Walkup
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers)Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (4 papers)
- Journals
- ScienceProceedings of the National Academy of SciencesJournal of the American Chemical Society
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Gene C. Jamieson
32 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Molecular Biology 390
- Plant Science 321
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 318
- Insect Science 242
- Genetics 207
Countries citing papers authored by Gene C. Jamieson
This map shows the geographic impact of Gene C. Jamieson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gene C. Jamieson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gene C. Jamieson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gene C. Jamieson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gene C. Jamieson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gene C. Jamieson. The network helps show where Gene C. Jamieson may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gene C. Jamieson
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gene C. Jamieson. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gene C. Jamieson based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gene C. Jamieson. Gene C. Jamieson is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 27 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 28 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | 73 | |
| 13 | 81 | |
| 14 | 12 | |
| 15 | 52 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 8 | |
| 19 | 56 | |
| 20 | 101 |
About Gene C. Jamieson
Gene C. Jamieson is a scholar working on Spectroscopy, Insect Science and Toxicology, having authored 32 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (4 papers) and Cancer therapeutics and mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (242 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (318 citations) and Biotechnology (82 citations). Gene C. Jamieson has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include David A. Schooley, David Rhodes, Charles A. Miller, Glenn McEnroe, Robert M. Scarborough, Sven Krämer, Carol C. Reuter, Robert D. Walkup, Carl Djerassi and Philip Haworth. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences and Journal of the American Chemical Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.