Gemma L. Mitchell

621 total citations
10 papers, 470 citations indexed

About

Gemma L. Mitchell is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Clinical Psychology and Nutrition and Dietetics. According to data from OpenAlex, Gemma L. Mitchell has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 470 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 3 papers in Clinical Psychology and 3 papers in Nutrition and Dietetics. Recurrent topics in Gemma L. Mitchell's work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers). Gemma L. Mitchell is often cited by papers focused on Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (3 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (3 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (3 papers). Gemma L. Mitchell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Gemma L. Mitchell's co-authors include Jeffrey M. Brunstrom, Claire Farrow, Emma Haycraft, Caroline Meyer, Charles Crook, Suzanne Higgs, Amy Ramsay, Natalie Dodd, Marit Helen Andersen and Simon M. Collin and has published in prestigious journals such as Physiology & Behavior, Appetite and Current Obesity Reports.

In The Last Decade

Gemma L. Mitchell

10 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gemma L. Mitchell United Kingdom 8 214 195 111 100 75 10 470
Jennifer Atieno Fisher United States 4 235 1.1× 132 0.7× 110 1.0× 114 1.1× 32 0.4× 4 359
Natalie Rigal France 14 444 2.1× 231 1.2× 198 1.8× 156 1.6× 42 0.6× 32 712
Chandani Nekitsing United Kingdom 10 401 1.9× 137 0.7× 179 1.6× 155 1.6× 78 1.0× 15 602
Esther Jansen Netherlands 5 362 1.7× 310 1.6× 157 1.4× 46 0.5× 42 0.6× 6 539
Leonard H. Epstein United States 8 361 1.7× 209 1.1× 65 0.6× 57 0.6× 32 0.4× 9 520
Candace Kurth United States 9 351 1.6× 265 1.4× 36 0.3× 103 1.0× 30 0.4× 12 763
Kameron J. Moding United States 14 315 1.5× 163 0.8× 198 1.8× 127 1.3× 71 0.9× 42 508
Frances G Saad United States 8 216 1.0× 249 1.3× 45 0.4× 56 0.6× 12 0.2× 8 453
É. Rémy France 5 387 1.8× 128 0.7× 154 1.4× 154 1.5× 41 0.5× 5 505
Hannah Jilani Germany 13 220 1.0× 47 0.2× 64 0.6× 133 1.3× 20 0.3× 23 428

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma L. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma L. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma L. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma L. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma L. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma L. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma L. Mitchell. The network helps show where Gemma L. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gemma L. Mitchell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gemma L. Mitchell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gemma L. Mitchell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gemma L. Mitchell. Gemma L. Mitchell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Mitchell, Gemma L.. (2015). Encouraging Fathers to Care: The Children and Families Act 2014 and Shared Parental Leave. Industrial Law Journal. 44(1). 123–133. 5 indexed citations
2.
Farrow, Claire, Emma Haycraft, & Gemma L. Mitchell. (2012). Milk Feeding, Solid Feeding, and Obesity Risk: A Review of the Relationships Between Early Life Feeding Practices and Later Adiposity. Current Obesity Reports. 2(1). 58–64. 6 indexed citations
3.
Mitchell, Gemma L., Claire Farrow, Emma Haycraft, & Caroline Meyer. (2012). Parental influences on children’s eating behaviour and characteristics of successful parent-focussed interventions. Appetite. 60(1). 85–94. 199 indexed citations
4.
Crook, Charles & Gemma L. Mitchell. (2012). Ambience in social learning: student engagement with new designs for learning spaces. Cambridge Journal of Education. 42(2). 121–139. 45 indexed citations
5.
Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. & Gemma L. Mitchell. (2006). Flavor–nutrient learning in restrained and unrestrained eaters. Physiology & Behavior. 90(1). 133–141. 55 indexed citations
6.
Brunstrom, Jeffrey M. & Gemma L. Mitchell. (2006). Effects of distraction on the development of satiety.. PubMed. 96(4). 761–9. 99 indexed citations
7.
Mitchell, Gemma L. & Jeffrey M. Brunstrom. (2005). Everyday dietary behaviour and the relationship between attention and meal size. Appetite. 45(3). 344–355. 28 indexed citations
8.
Brunstrom, Jeffrey M., Suzanne Higgs, & Gemma L. Mitchell. (2005). Dietary restraint and US devaluation predict evaluative learning. Physiology & Behavior. 85(5). 524–535. 12 indexed citations
9.
Brunstrom, Jeffrey M., et al.. (2005). Dietary restraint and cognitive performance in children. Appetite. 45(3). 235–241. 12 indexed citations
10.
Stevens, Jeni, Marit Helen Andersen, Simon M. Collin, et al.. (2004). Carers' perceptions of pain in people with dementia: a grounded theory approach.. PubMed. 11(2). 4–11. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026