Natalie Rigal

1.0k total citations
32 papers, 712 citations indexed

About

Natalie Rigal is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Natalie Rigal has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 712 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 19 papers in Clinical Psychology, 17 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 11 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Natalie Rigal's work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (17 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (15 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (10 papers). Natalie Rigal is often cited by papers focused on Eating Disorders and Behaviors (17 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (15 papers) and Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (10 papers). Natalie Rigal collaborates with scholars based in France, United States and United Kingdom. Natalie Rigal's co-authors include Sandrine Monnery-Patris, Claire Chabanet, Sylvie Issanchou, Saadi Lahlou, Pierre Combris, Bruno Simmen, Olivier Allais, Paulo Albuquerque, Patrick Pasquet and Céline Bonnet and has published in prestigious journals such as Social Science & Medicine, International Journal of Obesity and Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science.

In The Last Decade

Natalie Rigal

29 papers receiving 686 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Natalie Rigal France 14 444 231 198 171 156 32 712
Sandrine Monnery-Patris France 18 524 1.2× 287 1.2× 244 1.2× 239 1.4× 215 1.4× 45 1.0k
Per Møller Denmark 13 505 1.1× 186 0.8× 179 0.9× 217 1.3× 306 2.0× 23 1.0k
Victoria K. Aldridge United Kingdom 11 210 0.5× 225 1.0× 222 1.1× 127 0.7× 89 0.6× 18 610
Diane Marlin United States 7 725 1.6× 408 1.8× 354 1.8× 222 1.3× 280 1.8× 10 1.2k
Kameron J. Moding United States 14 315 0.7× 163 0.7× 198 1.0× 75 0.4× 127 0.8× 42 508
Wendy Bounds United States 10 1.0k 2.3× 227 1.0× 304 1.5× 135 0.8× 390 2.5× 17 1.4k
Carel Vereijken Netherlands 11 243 0.5× 70 0.3× 160 0.8× 170 1.0× 63 0.4× 17 691
Sara Ahern United Kingdom 13 433 1.0× 142 0.6× 185 0.9× 71 0.4× 141 0.9× 23 718
Chandani Nekitsing United Kingdom 10 401 0.9× 137 0.6× 179 0.9× 68 0.4× 155 1.0× 15 602
Jérémie Lafraire France 12 189 0.4× 134 0.6× 121 0.6× 155 0.9× 129 0.8× 36 532

Countries citing papers authored by Natalie Rigal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Natalie Rigal's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Natalie Rigal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Natalie Rigal more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Natalie Rigal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Natalie Rigal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Natalie Rigal. The network helps show where Natalie Rigal may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Natalie Rigal

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Natalie Rigal. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Natalie Rigal based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Natalie Rigal. Natalie Rigal is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Rigal, Natalie, et al.. (2024). Parental descriptions of sensory processing in Autism. Research in autism spectrum disorders. 118. 102488–102488.
2.
Cazalis, Fabienne, et al.. (2024). Revue systématique des méthodes d’évaluation du traitement sensoriel chez les enfants et adolescents autistes. Neuropsychiatrie de l Enfance et de l Adolescence. 72(7). 305–321. 1 indexed citations
3.
Rigal, Natalie, et al.. (2022). Plate waste increases with the number of foods proposed: An exploratory experimental study in adolescents’ school canteens. Appetite. 178. 106005–106005. 8 indexed citations
4.
Godart, Nathalie, et al.. (2021). Patients and Parents’ Experience of Multi-Family Therapy for Anorexia Nervosa: A Pilot Study. Frontiers in Psychology. 12. 584565–584565. 15 indexed citations
5.
6.
Rigal, Natalie, et al.. (2019). Food portion at ages 8–11 and obesogeny: The amount of food given to children varies with the mother's education and the child's appetite arousal. Social Science & Medicine. 228. 111–116. 11 indexed citations
7.
Trinchera, Laura, et al.. (2017). Disentangling the effects of parental food restriction on child's risk of overweight. Appetite. 123. 82–90. 6 indexed citations
8.
Trinchera, Laura, et al.. (2016). Behavioural measures of child's eating temperament and their link with BMI. Appetite. 110. 6–14. 3 indexed citations
9.
Rigal, Natalie, et al.. (2016). Is harsh caregiving effective in toddlers with low inhibitory control? An experimental study in the food domain. Infant Behavior and Development. 43. 5–12. 11 indexed citations
10.
Yuan, Wen Lun, Natalie Rigal, Sandrine Monnery-Patris, et al.. (2016). Early determinants of food liking among 5y-old children: a longitudinal study from the EDEN mother-child cohort. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity. 13(1). 20–20. 32 indexed citations
11.
Monnery-Patris, Sandrine, Sandra Wagner, Natalie Rigal, et al.. (2015). Smell differential reactivity, but not taste differential reactivity, is related to food neophobia in toddlers. Appetite. 95. 303–309. 31 indexed citations
12.
Ballon, Nicolas, Sylvie Berthoz, Paul Brunault, & Natalie Rigal. (2015). L’alimentation est-elle soluble dans la psychologie et la psychiatrie ? Cas de l’alimentation émotionnelle et de l’addiction à l’alimentation. European Psychiatry. 30(S2). S29–S29.
13.
Rigal, Natalie, Claire Chabanet, Sylvie Issanchou, & Sandrine Monnery-Patris. (2012). Links between maternal feeding practices and children’s eating difficulties. Validation of French tools. Appetite. 58(2). 629–637. 70 indexed citations
14.
Lauzon‐Guillain, Blandine de, Andréia Oliveira, Marie‐Aline Charles, et al.. (2012). A Review of Methods to Assess Parental Feeding Practices and Preschool Children's Eating Behavior: The Need for Further Development of Tools. Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. 112(10). 1578–1602.e8. 90 indexed citations
15.
Monnery-Patris, Sandrine, Natalie Rigal, Claire Chabanet, et al.. (2011). Parental practices perceived by children using a French version of the Kids’ Child Feeding Questionnaire. Appetite. 57(1). 161–166. 16 indexed citations
16.
Rigal, Natalie. (2010). Diversification alimentaire et construction du goût. Archives de Pédiatrie. 17. S208–S212. 6 indexed citations
17.
Monneuse, Marie-Odile, et al.. (2007). Taste acuity of obese adolescents and changes in food neophobia and food preferences during a weight reduction session. Appetite. 50(2-3). 302–307. 40 indexed citations
18.
Rigal, Natalie, et al.. (2007). Measuring willingness to try new foods: A self-report questionnaire for French-speaking children. Appetite. 50(2-3). 408–414. 45 indexed citations
19.
Rigal, Natalie, et al.. (2005). Impact du régime d'éviction sur la néophobie dans le cadre d'une allergie alimentaire chez l'enfant : étude exploratoire. Archives de Pédiatrie. 12(12). 1714–1720. 23 indexed citations
20.
Rigal, Natalie. (1999). La naissance du goût. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026