Gemma Derrick

1.4k total citations
56 papers, 910 citations indexed

About

Gemma Derrick is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Gemma Derrick has authored 56 papers receiving a total of 910 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 11 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 10 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Gemma Derrick's work include scientometrics and bibliometrics research (11 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (10 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (8 papers). Gemma Derrick is often cited by papers focused on scientometrics and bibliometrics research (11 papers), Evaluation and Performance Assessment (10 papers) and Health and Medical Research Impacts (8 papers). Gemma Derrick collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Spain. Gemma Derrick's co-authors include Gabrielle Samuel, Abby Haynes, Wayne Hall, Simon Chapman, Heidi Sturk, Sally Redman, James Gillespie, Vincenzo Pavone, Thed N. van Leeuwen and Koen Jonkers and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, The Lancet and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Gemma Derrick

55 papers receiving 865 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Gemma Derrick United Kingdom 18 212 176 174 151 128 56 910
Claire Donovan United Kingdom 15 170 0.8× 148 0.8× 170 1.0× 84 0.6× 110 0.9× 38 811
Creso M. Sá Canada 16 91 0.4× 110 0.6× 127 0.7× 60 0.4× 60 0.5× 58 869
Emanuela Reale Italy 14 70 0.3× 224 1.3× 127 0.7× 45 0.3× 99 0.8× 42 811
Mathijs de Vaan United States 13 77 0.4× 175 1.0× 234 1.3× 80 0.5× 53 0.4× 25 994
Darrell R. Lewis United States 20 124 0.6× 126 0.7× 103 0.6× 77 0.5× 125 1.0× 95 1.5k
Simon Smith United Kingdom 13 246 1.2× 32 0.2× 138 0.8× 55 0.4× 63 0.5× 44 751
Yian Yin United States 11 117 0.6× 267 1.5× 230 1.3× 123 0.8× 30 0.2× 15 1.0k
John Rigby United Kingdom 14 50 0.2× 239 1.4× 82 0.5× 103 0.7× 53 0.4× 81 791
María Nedeva United Kingdom 17 47 0.2× 177 1.0× 134 0.8× 46 0.3× 64 0.5× 36 879
Catherine P. Slade United States 10 71 0.3× 124 0.7× 89 0.5× 67 0.4× 20 0.2× 28 697

Countries citing papers authored by Gemma Derrick

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gemma Derrick's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gemma Derrick with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gemma Derrick more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gemma Derrick

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gemma Derrick. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gemma Derrick. The network helps show where Gemma Derrick may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gemma Derrick

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gemma Derrick. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gemma Derrick based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gemma Derrick. Gemma Derrick is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Derrick, Gemma. (2024). An exploratory analysis of the operational restrictions of virtual peer review panels. Research Evaluation. 34. 1 indexed citations
3.
Derrick, Gemma, et al.. (2024). The gravity of the status quo: the response of research governance to system-level shocks. Higher Education. 90(1). 89–108. 1 indexed citations
4.
Derrick, Gemma, et al.. (2023). Targeted, actionable and fair: Reviewer reports as feedback and its effect on ECR career choices. Research Evaluation. 32(4). 648–657. 2 indexed citations
5.
Derrick, Gemma, et al.. (2022). The relationship between parenting engagement and academic performance. Scientific Reports. 12(1). 22300–22300. 13 indexed citations
6.
Chubb, Jennifer & Gemma Derrick. (2020). The impact a-gender: gendered orientations towards research Impact and its evaluation. Palgrave Communications. 6(1). 16 indexed citations
7.
Derrick, Gemma. (2020). Editorial−Embracing How Scholarly Publishing Can Build a New Research Culture, Post-COVID-19. Publications. 8(2). 26–26. 2 indexed citations
8.
Derrick, Gemma, et al.. (2019). Models of parenting and its effect on academic productivity: Preliminary results from an international survey. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 1670–1676. 11 indexed citations
9.
Samuel, Gabrielle, et al.. (2018). From “a Fair Game” to “a Form of Covert Research”: Research Ethics Committee Members’ Differing Notions of Consent and Potential Risk to Participants Within Social Media Research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics. 13(2). 149–159. 34 indexed citations
10.
Derrick, Gemma, et al.. (2018). Towards characterising negative impact: Introducing Grimpact. VBN Forskningsportal (Aalborg Universitet). 1199–1213. 13 indexed citations
11.
Ginsburg, Ophira, Peter Boyle, Gemma Derrick, et al.. (2016). Changing global policy to deliver safe, equitable, and affordable care for women’s cancers. The Lancet. 389(10071). 871–880. 71 indexed citations
12.
13.
Derrick, Gemma, et al.. (2014). Invisible Intermediaries: A Systematic Review into the Role of Research Management in University and Institutional Research Processes. 45(2). 11–45. 11 indexed citations
14.
Derrick, Gemma, et al.. (2014). Unwrapping “impact” for evaluation : A co-word analysis of the UK REF2014 policy documents using VOSviewer. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 6 indexed citations
15.
Derrick, Gemma & James B. Gillespie. (2013). "A number you just can’t get away from” : Characteristics of Adoption and the Social Construction of Metric Use by Researchers. Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University). 6 indexed citations
16.
Jonkers, Koen & Gemma Derrick. (2012). The bibliometric bandwagon: Characteristics of bibliometric articles outside the field literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(4). 829–836. 21 indexed citations
17.
Haynes, Abby, Gemma Derrick, Sally Redman, et al.. (2012). Identifying Trustworthy Experts: How Do Policymakers Find and Assess Public Health Researchers Worth Consulting or Collaborating With?. PLoS ONE. 7(3). e32665–e32665. 65 indexed citations
18.
Chapman, Simon & Gemma Derrick. (2012). Bibliographic analysis of papers and authors published inTobacco Control1998–September 2011. Tobacco Control. 21(2). 198–201. 6 indexed citations
19.
Haynes, Abby, Gemma Derrick, Simon Chapman, et al.. (2011). From “our world” to the “real world”: Exploring the views and behaviour of policy-influential Australian public health researchers. Social Science & Medicine. 72(7). 1047–1055. 57 indexed citations
20.
Haynes, Abby, James Gillespie, Gemma Derrick, et al.. (2011). Galvanizers, Guides, Champions, and Shields: The Many Ways That Policymakers Use Public Health Researchers. Milbank Quarterly. 89(4). 564–598. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026