Gema Huesa
About
In The Last Decade
Gema Huesa
16 papers receiving 580 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Molecular Biology 193
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 161
- Physiology 142
- Cell Biology 121
- Neurology 100
Countries citing papers authored by Gema Huesa
This map shows the geographic impact of Gema Huesa's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gema Huesa with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gema Huesa more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gema Huesa
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gema Huesa. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gema Huesa. The network helps show where Gema Huesa may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gema Huesa
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gema Huesa. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gema Huesa based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gema Huesa. Gema Huesa is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 92 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 19 | |
| 5 | 92 | |
| 6 | 71 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 21 | |
| 9 | 28 | |
| 10 | 61 | |
| 11 | 86 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 28 | |
| 14 | 21 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 26 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.