Gail W. Lapidus
- Political Science and International Relations top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Janet W. SalaffAlexander DallinBeatrice FarnsworthMary FischerNicholas V. RiasanovskyDorothy AtkinsonGuy E. SwansonJoan Huber
- Topics
- Soviet and Russian History (8 papers)Russia and Soviet political economy (8 papers)Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesRussia
In The Last Decade
Gail W. Lapidus
40 papers receiving 329 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
- Political Science and International Relations 305
- Sociology and Political Science 279
- Gender Studies 87
- Economics and Econometrics 37
- General Health Professions 34
Countries citing papers authored by Gail W. Lapidus
This map shows the geographic impact of Gail W. Lapidus's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail W. Lapidus with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail W. Lapidus more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Gail W. Lapidus
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail W. Lapidus. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail W. Lapidus. The network helps show where Gail W. Lapidus may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gail W. Lapidus
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gail W. Lapidus. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gail W. Lapidus based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gail W. Lapidus. Gail W. Lapidus is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | War in Chechnya as a Paradigm of Russian State-Building Under Putin, The | 1 |
| 3 | 25 | |
| 4 | 51 | |
| 5 | Nationalism, Ethnic Identity and Conflict Management in Russia Today | 3 |
| 6 | The Soviet System: From Crisis To Collapse | 9 |
| 7 | The "Nationality" question in the Soviet Union | 5 |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | The Interaction of Women's Work and Family Roles in the USSR | 12 |
| 11 | State and welfare, USA/USSR : contemporary policy and practice | 9 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 30 | |
| 14 | 26 | |
| 15 | 55 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Gail W. Lapidus
Gail W. Lapidus is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Public Administration and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 44 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soviet and Russian History (8 papers), Russia and Soviet political economy (8 papers) and Post-Soviet Geopolitical Dynamics (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (305 citations), Gender Studies (87 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (279 citations). Gail W. Lapidus has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Russia. Frequent co-authors include Janet W. Salaff, Alexander Dallin, Beatrice Farnsworth, Mary Fischer, Nicholas V. Riasanovsky, Dorothy Atkinson, Guy E. Swanson, Joan Huber, Peter Reddaway and George W. Breslauer. Their work appears in journals such as Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews, Social Forces and Journal of Marriage and the Family.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.