Philip Goldman

1.3k total citations · 1 hit paper
18 papers, 533 citations indexed

About

Philip Goldman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Clinical Psychology and Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. According to data from OpenAlex, Philip Goldman has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 533 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Clinical Psychology and 5 papers in Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health. Recurrent topics in Philip Goldman's work include Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers). Philip Goldman is often cited by papers focused on Child Welfare and Adoption (4 papers), Global Maternal and Child Health (4 papers) and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (4 papers). Philip Goldman collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Africa. Philip Goldman's co-authors include Charles A. Nelson, Charles H. Zeanah, Susan D. Hillis, Nathan A. Fox, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Marian J. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Megan R. Gunnar, Edmund Sonuga‐Barke, Sophie Reijman and Robbie Duschinsky and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews and Foreign Affairs.

In The Last Decade

Philip Goldman

17 papers receiving 496 citations

Hit Papers

Global minimum estimates of children affected by COVID-19... 2021 2026 2022 2024 2021 40 80 120

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Philip Goldman United States 10 240 192 188 99 55 18 533
Jini L. Roby United States 16 145 0.6× 269 1.4× 280 1.5× 102 1.0× 39 0.7× 41 572
Rachel Bray United States 13 139 0.6× 223 1.2× 214 1.1× 147 1.5× 42 0.8× 36 562
Katharine Hill United States 13 279 1.2× 135 0.7× 266 1.4× 177 1.8× 28 0.5× 30 549
Maria Berghs United Kingdom 12 115 0.5× 129 0.7× 161 0.9× 104 1.1× 44 0.8× 47 489
Marie–Antoinette Sossou United States 9 147 0.6× 137 0.7× 63 0.3× 108 1.1× 32 0.6× 16 363
Jason Castillo United States 14 235 1.0× 264 1.4× 53 0.3× 170 1.7× 25 0.5× 32 537
Schools 5 245 1.0× 154 0.8× 74 0.4× 178 1.8× 46 0.8× 12 563
Edward Kruk Canada 15 148 0.6× 346 1.8× 73 0.4× 81 0.8× 29 0.5× 32 593
Debora Ortega United States 9 147 0.6× 182 0.9× 124 0.7× 115 1.2× 21 0.4× 31 433
Christopher G. Petr United States 15 245 1.0× 99 0.5× 132 0.7× 204 2.1× 52 0.9× 30 528

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Goldman

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Goldman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Goldman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Goldman more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Goldman

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Goldman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Goldman. The network helps show where Philip Goldman may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Goldman

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Goldman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Goldman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Goldman. Philip Goldman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Hillis, Susan D., Philip Goldman, Seth Flaxman, et al.. (2024). The effectiveness of Hope Groups, a mental health, parenting support, and violence prevention program for families affected by the war in Ukraine: Findings from a pre-post study. Journal of Migration and Health. 10. 100251–100251. 3 indexed citations
3.
Unwin, H. Juliette T., Susan D. Hillis, Lucie Cluver, et al.. (2022). Global, regional, and national minimum estimates of children affected by COVID-19-associated orphanhood and caregiver death, by age and family circumstance up to Oct 31, 2021: an updated modelling study. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 6(4). 249–259. 44 indexed citations
4.
Hillis, Susan D., H. Juliette T. Unwin, Yu Chen, et al.. (2021). Global minimum estimates of children affected by COVID-19-associated orphanhood and deaths of caregivers: a modelling study. The Lancet. 398(10298). 391–402. 141 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Hillis, Susan D., H. Juliette T. Unwin, Lucie Cluver, et al.. (2021). Under the Radar: Global Minimum Estimates for COVID-19-Associated Orphanhood and Deaths Among Caregivers During 2020. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
6.
Hillis, Susan D., H. Juliette T. Unwin, Lucie Cluver, et al.. (2021). Children : the hidden pandemic 2021 : a joint report of COVID-19- associated orphanhood and a strategy for action.
7.
Unwin, H. Juliette T., Susan D. Hillis, Lucie Cluver, et al.. (2021). More than 5.2 Million Children Affected by Global Surges in COVID-Associated Orphanhood and Caregiver Death: New Evidence for National Responses. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
8.
Howard, Amanda, et al.. (2020). Rapid return of children in residential care to family as a result of COVID-19: Scope, challenges, and recommendations. Child Abuse & Neglect. 110(Pt 2). 104712–104712. 26 indexed citations
9.
IJzendoorn, Marinus H. van, Marian J. Bakermans‐Kranenburg, Robbie Duschinsky, et al.. (2020). Institutionalisation and deinstitutionalisation of children 1: a systematic and integrative review of evidence regarding effects on development. The Lancet Psychiatry. 7(8). 703–720. 155 indexed citations
10.
Goldman, Philip, Marinus H. van IJzendoorn, Edmund Sonuga‐Barke, et al.. (2020). The implications of COVID-19 for the care of children living in residential institutions. The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health. 4(6). e12–e12. 45 indexed citations
11.
Boothby, Neil, Robert L. Balster, Philip Goldman, et al.. (2012). Coordinated and evidence-based policy and practice for protecting children outside of family care. Child Abuse & Neglect. 36(10). 743–751. 11 indexed citations
12.
Fluke, John, Philip Goldman, Susan D. Hillis, et al.. (2012). Systems, strategies, and interventions for sustainable long-term care and protection of children with a history of living outside of family care. Child Abuse & Neglect. 36(10). 722–731. 27 indexed citations
13.
Bremmer, Ian, et al.. (1995). Nations and Politics in the Soviet Successor States.. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 24(1). 13–13. 7 indexed citations
14.
Legvold, Robert, Gail W. Lapidus, Victor Zaslavsky, & Philip Goldman. (1992). From Union to Commonwealth: Nationalism and Separatism in the Soviet Republics. Foreign Affairs. 71(5). 213–213. 5 indexed citations
15.
Goldman, Philip. (1992). From Union to Commonwealth. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 35 indexed citations
16.
Goldman, Philip, et al.. (1986). Counterpoint in Maori Culture.. Man. 21(2). 367–367. 14 indexed citations
17.
Goldman, Philip & James F. Fisher. (1980). Himalayan Anthropology: The Indo-Tibetan Interface.. RAIN. 10–10. 14 indexed citations
18.
Goldman, Philip, et al.. (1976). Nepal: Where the Gods are Young. RAIN. 8–8. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026