Gail J. Mitchell

2.6k citations
126 papers · 1.9k indexed · h-index 25

Impact in

Papers in

Gail J. Mitchell

122 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Gail J. Mitchell
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
  • Research and Theory 168
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 173
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 106
  • Conservation 202
  • General Health Professions 906
Replace Rosemarie Rizzo Parse with:
Rosemarie Rizzo Parse United States
Jean Watson United States
Theodore Stickley United Kingdom
Jean Watson United States
Nancy Drew United States
Sue Davies United Kingdom
Shirley M. Solberg Canada
Hildegard E. Peplau United States
Pamela M. Ironside United States
Kristen M. Swanson United States
Gail J. Mitchell relative to Rosemarie Rizzo Parse United States Rosemarie Rizzo Parse's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Rosemarie Rizzo Parse · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gail J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail J. Mitchell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail J. Mitchell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail J. Mitchell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail J. Mitchell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail J. Mitchell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail J. Mitchell. The network helps show where Gail J. Mitchell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Gail J. Mitchell, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gail J. Mitchell Line = papers co-authored together Gail J. Mitchell links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 202113
3 202025
4 201518
5 201323
6 201143
7 201044
8 201058
9 200973
10 200645
11 200310
12 20037
13 20021
14 20011
15 20006
16 200014
17 199817
18 19943
19 199125
20 199010

About Gail J. Mitchell

Gail J. Mitchell is a scholar working on Issues, ethics and legal aspects, Research and Theory, Conservation, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 126 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Therapy and Mental Health (17 papers), Participatory Visual Research Methods (12 papers), Empathy and Medical Education (12 papers), Nursing education and management (9 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (9 papers), Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units (8 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (8 papers) and Nursing Education, Practice, and Leadership (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (168 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (173 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (106 citations), Conservation (202 citations) and General Health Professions (906 citations). Gail J. Mitchell has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Pia Kontos, Christine Jonas‐Simpson, William K. Cody, Sherry L. Dupuis, Karen‐Lee Miller, Debra A. Bournes, F. Beryl Pilkington, Julia Gray, Jennifer Carson and Cheryl Cott. Their work appears in journals such as Nursing Science Quarterly, Dementia, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Qualitative Inquiry and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026