H. F. Barnes
- Insect Science top 5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Ecology
- Plant Science
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- P. A. BuxtonK. K. NayarG. W. Heath
- Topics
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers)Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (7 papers)Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
H. F. Barnes
26 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
- Insect Science 111
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 81
- Ecology 67
- Plant Science 64
- Molecular Biology 30
Countries citing papers authored by H. F. Barnes
This map shows the geographic impact of H. F. Barnes's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H. F. Barnes with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H. F. Barnes more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by H. F. Barnes
This network shows the impact of papers produced by H. F. Barnes. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H. F. Barnes. The network helps show where H. F. Barnes may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of H. F. Barnes
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H. F. Barnes. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H. F. Barnes based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H. F. Barnes. H. F. Barnes is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | The susceptibility of some American wheats to the wheat blossom midges. | 1 |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | Gall midges of cereal crops | 33 |
| 7 | Gall Midges of economic Importance. Yol. VII. Gall Midges of Cereal Crops. | 23 |
| 8 | Biosystematics as applied to the Cecidomyiidae | 1 |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | Memorandum on the gall midges living on the sorghums, the Panicum millets and rice | 5 |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | The gall midges living in the white clover flowers | 4 |
| 13 | 9 | |
| 14 | The wheat blossom midges | 5 |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 2 | |
| 17 | 23 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | Gall midges of trees | 5 |
| 20 | Marking and breeding Testacella slugs | 2 |
About H. F. Barnes
H. F. Barnes is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Plant Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 170 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (8 papers), Hymenoptera taxonomy and phylogeny (7 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (111 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (81 citations) and Ecology (67 citations). H. F. Barnes has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include P. A. Buxton, K. K. Nayar and G. W. Heath. Their work appears in journals such as Annals of Applied Biology, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata and Plant Pathology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.