G. W. Crabtree
- Condensed Matter Physics top 0.1%
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials top 1%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics top 1%
- Materials Chemistry top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Topics
- Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (80 papers)Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (42 papers)Rare-earth and actinide compounds (38 papers)
- Cited by
- Condensed Matter PhysicsElectronic, Optical and Magnetic MaterialsAtomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Partner nations
- United StatesSwitzerlandJapan
In The Last Decade
G. W. Crabtree
114 papers receiving 5.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Condensed Matter Physics 5.0k
- Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 2.5k
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 1.6k
- Materials Chemistry 550
- Biomedical Engineering 460
Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Crabtree
This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Crabtree's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Crabtree with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Crabtree more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Crabtree
This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Crabtree. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Crabtree. The network helps show where G. W. Crabtree may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. W. Crabtree
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. W. Crabtree. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. W. Crabtree based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. W. Crabtree. G. W. Crabtree is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 8 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 115 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 77 | |
| 10 | 5 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 28 | |
| 13 | 329 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 33 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About G. W. Crabtree
G. W. Crabtree is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, having authored 116 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (80 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (42 papers) and Rare-earth and actinide compounds (38 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (5.0k citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (2.5k citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (1.6k citations). G. W. Crabtree has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Japan. Frequent co-authors include W. K. Kwok, U. Welp, K. G. Vandervoort, J.W. Downey, J. Z. Liu, A. Umezawa, S. Fleshler, B. W. Veal, J. D. Jorgensen and D. D. Koelling. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Physical review. B, Condensed matter.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.