G. W. Ankersmit

46 total papers · 628 total citations
29 papers, 446 citations indexed

About

G. W. Ankersmit is a scholar working on Insect Science, Plant Science and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. W. Ankersmit has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 446 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Insect Science, 8 papers in Plant Science and 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics. Recurrent topics in G. W. Ankersmit's work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (9 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (7 papers). G. W. Ankersmit is often cited by papers focused on Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (19 papers), Insect Pheromone Research and Control (9 papers) and Insect behavior and control techniques (7 papers). G. W. Ankersmit collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Czechia and United States. G. W. Ankersmit's co-authors include R. Rabbinge, H. Dijkman, G.A. Pak, Perry L. Adkisson, M. J. Berlinger, C.L.M. de Visser, Catherine Bell, D. J. de Jong, David L. Denlinger and Juergen Wilde and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Insect Physiology, Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata and European Journal of Plant Pathology.

In The Last Decade

G. W. Ankersmit

26 papers receiving 368 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
G. W. Ankersmit 384 210 126 83 63 29 446
Anamika Sharma 326 0.8× 258 1.2× 112 0.9× 95 1.1× 44 0.7× 35 456
D. J. W. Rose 305 0.8× 272 1.3× 86 0.7× 155 1.9× 74 1.2× 30 475
Ming‐Hong Lu 288 0.8× 212 1.0× 105 0.8× 108 1.3× 62 1.0× 22 424
Lucy Alford 399 1.0× 232 1.1× 125 1.0× 126 1.5× 93 1.5× 29 513
Kei Kawazu 295 0.8× 207 1.0× 123 1.0× 88 1.1× 53 0.8× 26 436
Yizhong Yang 373 1.0× 206 1.0× 163 1.3× 165 2.0× 64 1.0× 44 542
Alan C. Bartlett 364 0.9× 184 0.9× 90 0.7× 201 2.4× 54 0.9× 41 468
József Fail 366 1.0× 305 1.5× 159 1.3× 76 0.9× 66 1.0× 56 494
Stanley G. Wellso 235 0.6× 167 0.8× 119 0.9× 97 1.2× 156 2.5× 47 420
Jeffrey Gardner 491 1.3× 260 1.2× 136 1.1× 154 1.9× 65 1.0× 28 539

Countries citing papers authored by G. W. Ankersmit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. W. Ankersmit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. W. Ankersmit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. W. Ankersmit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. W. Ankersmit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. W. Ankersmit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. W. Ankersmit. The network helps show where G. W. Ankersmit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. W. Ankersmit

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. W. Ankersmit. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. W. Ankersmit based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. W. Ankersmit. G. W. Ankersmit is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026