Julia A. Meredith
- Insect Science top 2%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Co-authors
- Peter E. A. TealMark J. CarrollEric A. SchmelzStephen M. PhippsPrem S. ChoureySherry LeClereHans T. AlbornR.J. Nachman
- Topics
- Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers)Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomKenya
In The Last Decade
Julia A. Meredith
13 papers receiving 460 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Insect Science 283
- Plant Science 242
- Molecular Biology 113
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 95
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 80
Countries citing papers authored by Julia A. Meredith
This map shows the geographic impact of Julia A. Meredith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Julia A. Meredith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Julia A. Meredith more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Julia A. Meredith
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Julia A. Meredith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Julia A. Meredith. The network helps show where Julia A. Meredith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Julia A. Meredith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Julia A. Meredith. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Julia A. Meredith based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Julia A. Meredith. Julia A. Meredith is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 287 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 57 | |
| 7 | 31 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | Research Notes: Response of Three Tobacco Cultivars to Three Rotylenchulus reniformis Populations | 1 |
| 11 | Parasitism of Rotylenchulus reniformis on Soybean Root Rhizobium Nodules in Venezuela. | 3 |
| 12 | Other Contributions: Individual and Combined Effect of Meloidogyne incognita and M. javanica on Four Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L.) Cultivars in Venezuela | 1 |
| 13 | Other Contributions: Parasitic Nematodes Associated with Cultivars and Clons of Banana and Plantain in Venezuela | 2 |
About Julia A. Meredith
Julia A. Meredith is a scholar working on Insect Science, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Plant Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 473 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (5 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (283 citations), Plant Science (242 citations) and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (95 citations). Julia A. Meredith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Kenya. Frequent co-authors include Peter E. A. Teal, Mark J. Carroll, Eric A. Schmelz, Stephen M. Phipps, Prem S. Chourey, Sherry LeClere, Hans T. Alborn, R.J. Nachman, Ronald J. Nachman and Roland Bol. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Ecology and New Phytologist.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.