G. Schurtz

1.6k total citations
38 papers, 950 citations indexed

About

G. Schurtz is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Mechanics of Materials and Geophysics. According to data from OpenAlex, G. Schurtz has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 950 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 34 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 22 papers in Mechanics of Materials and 18 papers in Geophysics. Recurrent topics in G. Schurtz's work include Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (33 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (20 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (18 papers). G. Schurtz is often cited by papers focused on Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics (33 papers), Laser-induced spectroscopy and plasma (20 papers) and High-pressure geophysics and materials (18 papers). G. Schurtz collaborates with scholars based in France, Italy and Spain. G. Schurtz's co-authors include X. Ribeyre, M. Lafon, S. Weber, S. Atzeni, V. T. Tikhonchuk, Ph. Nicolaï, Stéphane Galera, J. Breil, M. Olazabal-Loumé and A. Schiavi and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Journal of Applied Physics and New Journal of Physics.

In The Last Decade

G. Schurtz

37 papers receiving 909 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
G. Schurtz France 19 829 567 393 374 119 38 950
Y. Aglitskiy United States 19 850 1.0× 506 0.9× 393 1.0× 285 0.8× 214 1.8× 47 1.0k
O. V. Gotchev United States 12 685 0.8× 389 0.7× 267 0.7× 275 0.7× 80 0.7× 19 734
L. J. Suter United States 14 778 0.9× 453 0.8× 410 1.0× 294 0.8× 106 0.9× 29 845
J. A. Marozas United States 21 1.1k 1.3× 612 1.1× 633 1.6× 375 1.0× 117 1.0× 51 1.2k
J. D. Kilkenny United States 19 837 1.0× 343 0.6× 309 0.8× 270 0.7× 66 0.6× 57 1.0k
B. F. Lasinski United States 14 622 0.8× 432 0.8× 394 1.0× 219 0.6× 106 0.9× 25 752
D. T. Michel United States 19 753 0.9× 535 0.9× 510 1.3× 195 0.5× 70 0.6× 40 850
S. A. Yi United States 16 686 0.8× 379 0.7× 351 0.9× 167 0.4× 75 0.6× 40 742
J. S. Ross United States 19 986 1.2× 578 1.0× 530 1.3× 282 0.8× 66 0.6× 65 1.1k
J. J. Honrubia Spain 21 1.4k 1.6× 888 1.6× 724 1.8× 487 1.3× 182 1.5× 63 1.5k

Countries citing papers authored by G. Schurtz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Schurtz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Schurtz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Schurtz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Schurtz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Schurtz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Schurtz. The network helps show where G. Schurtz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of G. Schurtz

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of G. Schurtz. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of G. Schurtz based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with G. Schurtz. G. Schurtz is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lafon, M., X. Ribeyre, & G. Schurtz. (2013). Optimal conditions for shock ignition of scaled cryogenic deuterium–tritium targets. Physics of Plasmas. 20(2). 9 indexed citations
2.
Baton, S. D., M. Kœnig, E. Brambrink, et al.. (2012). Experiment in Planar Geometry for Shock Ignition Studies. Physical Review Letters. 108(19). 195002–195002. 28 indexed citations
3.
Lescoute, E., T. de Rességuier, J.-M. Chevalier, et al.. (2011). Experimental and Numerical Study of Dynamic Fragmentation in Laser Shock-Loaded Gold and Aluminium Targets. Cmc-computers Materials & Continua. 22(3). 219–238. 1 indexed citations
4.
Atzeni, S. & G. Schurtz. (2011). HiPER target studies: towards the design of high gain, robust, scalable direct-drive targets with advanced ignition schemes. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 7 indexed citations
5.
Klimo, O., V. T. Tikhonchuk, X. Ribeyre, et al.. (2011). Laser plasma interaction studies in the context of shock ignition—Transition from collisional to collisionless absorption. Physics of Plasmas. 18(8). 42 indexed citations
6.
Schurtz, G., X. Ribeyre, & M. Lafon. (2010). Target design for shock ignition. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 244(2). 22013–22013. 3 indexed citations
7.
Cecchetti, C. A., M. Borghesi, J. Fuchs, et al.. (2009). Magnetic field measurements in laser-produced plasmas via proton deflectometry. Physics of Plasmas. 16(4). 47 indexed citations
8.
Ribeyre, X., M. Lafon, G. Schurtz, et al.. (2009). Shock ignition: modelling and target design robustness. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 51(12). 124030–124030. 39 indexed citations
9.
Hallo, L., A. Bourgeade, David G. Hebert, et al.. (2008). Formation of nanocavities in dielectrics: influence of equation of state. Applied Physics A. 92(4). 837–841. 9 indexed citations
10.
Atzeni, S., C. Bellei, J. R. Davies, et al.. (2008). Fast ignitor target studies for HiPER. Journal of Physics Conference Series. 112(2). 22062–22062. 2 indexed citations
11.
Hallo, L., A. Bourgeade, David G. Hebert, et al.. (2008). Formation of nanocavities in dielectrics: A self-consistent modeling. Physics of Plasmas. 15(9). 28 indexed citations
12.
Ribeyre, X., G. Schurtz, M. Lafon, Stéphane Galera, & S. Weber. (2008). Shock ignition: an alternative scheme for HiPER. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 51(1). 15013–15013. 89 indexed citations
13.
Ramis, R., José Carlos Ramı́rez, & G. Schurtz. (2008). Implosion symmetry of laser-irradiated cylindrical targets. Laser and Particle Beams. 26(1). 113–126. 11 indexed citations
14.
Tikhonchuk, V. T., Ph. Nicolaï, X. Ribeyre, et al.. (2008). Laboratory modeling of supersonic radiative jets propagation in plasmas and their scaling to astrophysical conditions. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 50(12). 124056–124056. 13 indexed citations
15.
Ribeyre, X., Ph. Nicolaï, G. Schurtz, et al.. (2008). Compression phase study of the HiPER baseline target. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion. 50(2). 25007–25007. 30 indexed citations
16.
Atzeni, S., A. Schiavi, J. J. Honrubia, et al.. (2008). Fast ignitor target studies for the HiPER project. Physics of Plasmas. 15(5). 63 indexed citations
17.
Schurtz, G., S. Gary, S. Hulin, et al.. (2007). Revisiting Nonlocal Electron-Energy Transport in Inertial-Fusion Conditions. Physical Review Letters. 98(9). 95002–95002. 53 indexed citations
18.
Hallo, L., M. Olazabal-Loumé, Pierre‐Henri Maire, et al.. (2006). Numerical simulations of hydrodynamic instabilities: Perturbation codes PANSY, PERLE, and 2D code CHIC applied to a realistic LIL target. Journal de Physique IV (Proceedings). 133. 135–139. 1 indexed citations
19.
Nicolaï, Ph., et al.. (2003). Progress in indirect drive hohlraum design for laser ICF. Self-generated magnetic field and non-local heat flux: Simulation with 2D radiation-hydrodynamic code and experimental validation. 1 indexed citations
20.
Dumont, H., et al.. (1999). Evolution of the target design for the MJ laser. Laser and Particle Beams. 17(3). 403–413. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Y. Aglitskiy Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by O. V. Gotchev Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by L. J. Suter Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. A. Marozas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. D. Kilkenny Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by B. F. Lasinski Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by D. T. Michel Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. A. Yi Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. S. Ross Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by J. J. Honrubia
Rankless by CCL
2026