New Journal of Physics

13.5k papers and 372.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 13.5k papers published in New Journal of Physics in the last decades have received a total of 372.7k indexed citations. Papers published in New Journal of Physics usually cover Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (8.7k papers), Artificial Intelligence (2.8k papers) and Condensed Matter Physics (2.0k papers) specifically the topics of Quantum Information and Cryptography (2.6k papers), Cold Atom Physics and Bose-Einstein Condensates (1.9k papers) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (1.5k papers). The most active scholars publishing in New Journal of Physics are Matjaž Perc, Martin B. Plenio, Motohiko Ezawa, Stephen B. Pope, Ulf Leonhardt, Attila Szolnoki, Shuichi Murakami, P. Zoller, T. G. Philbin and Steven Gregory.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in New Journal of Physics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in New Journal of Physics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in New Journal of Physics.

Countries where authors publish in New Journal of Physics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in New Journal of Physics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in New Journal of Physics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites New Journal of Physics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025