G. Poelchen

416 citations
23 papers · 249 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

G. Poelchen

20 papers receiving 246 citations

Peers

G. Poelchen
Comparison fields: 5 of 21
  • Condensed Matter Physics 187
  • Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials 173
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 80
  • Inorganic Chemistry 25
  • Acoustics and Ultrasonics 1
Replace M. S. Kim with:
M. S. Kim United States
F. Brückner Germany
Z. F. Weng China
J. Beare Canada
Keisuke Mitsumoto Japan
N. S. Sangeetha United States
A. Marcinkova United Kingdom
John Collini United States
Chunruo Duan United States
Fredrik Nilsson Sweden
G. Poelchen relative to M. S. Kim United States M. S. Kim's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
M. S. Kim · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by G. Poelchen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of G. Poelchen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by G. Poelchen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites G. Poelchen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by G. Poelchen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by G. Poelchen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by G. Poelchen. The network helps show where G. Poelchen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside G. Poelchen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with G. Poelchen Line = papers co-authored together G. Poelchen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 23 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201944
2 202122
3 202021
4 202320
5 202120
6 202014
7 202313
8 202012
9 202111
10 202310
11 202210
12 202110
13 202410
14 20227
15 20216
16 20225
17 20224
18 20234
19 20244
20 20242

About G. Poelchen

G. Poelchen is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Inorganic Chemistry and Materials Chemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 249 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Rare-earth and actinide compounds (15 papers), Iron-based superconductors research (12 papers), Advanced Condensed Matter Physics (6 papers), Magnetic and transport properties of perovskites and related materials (6 papers), Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism (5 papers), Magnetic properties of thin films (4 papers), Topological Materials and Phenomena (3 papers) and Inorganic Chemistry and Materials (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (187 citations), Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials (173 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (80 citations), Inorganic Chemistry (25 citations) and Acoustics and Ultrasonics (1 citation). G. Poelchen has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Spain and Russia. Frequent co-authors include D. V. Vyalikh, Kristin Kliemt, C. Krellner, K. Kummer, Dmitry Yu. Usachov, Susanne Schulz, C. Laubschat, Е. В. Чулков, M. Güttler and Alexander Generalov. Their work appears in journals such as Physical review. B., The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, npj Quantum Materials, Nature Communications and ACS Nano.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact